This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
Ohio News

Ohio Blocked From Implementing Law Restricting Children’s Use of Social Media

A law preventing children under 16 from using social media apps has hit another hurdle after a federal judge blocked it while a legal challenge takes place.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Ohio Blocked From Implementing Law Restricting Children’s Use of Social Media
A U.S. teenager uses her mobile phone to access social media on Jan. 31, 2024. Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Stephen Katte
Stephen Katte
2/12/2024|Updated: 2/12/2024
0:00

An Ohio law requiring children under 16 to get parental consent to use social media apps has been temporarily blocked by a federal judge as a legal challenge by a trade group representing social media companies’ proceeds.

Initially set to take effect Jan. 15, the law known as the “Parental Notification by Social Media Operators Act” would require anyone in Ohio below the age of 16 to ask for parental consent if they want to sign up for a social media account, whether it be Twitter, Instagram, or TikTok.

It would also force social media companies to provide privacy guidelines, so families know what content would be censored or moderated on their child’s profile.

In a Feb. 12 judgment, Algenon Marbley, chief U.S. district judge in the Southern District of Ohio, granted a preliminary injunction preventing the law from taking effect while a lawsuit filed by a trade group representing TikTok, Snapchat, Meta, and other major tech companies goes through the courts.

The trade group in question, NetChoice, has argued that the law is overly broad and vague and an unconstitutional impediment to free speech. The group has already won similar lawsuits in other states, including California and Arkansas.

In his decision, Judge Marbley said NetChoice has a good chance of winning its First Amendment speech freedom argument.

Related Stories
The Epoch Times
Social Media Ban for Those Under 16 Moves Forward in Florida Senate but DeSantis Airs Concerns About Legality
The Epoch Times
Editor’s Note

“There is no indication that the State disfavors the sort of content designed to appeal to children, cartoons and the like,” he wrote.

“Websites that children might access’ is not a topic or subject matter. Indeed, even though covered platforms contain some subject matter likely to appeal to children, most also contain subject matter ‘as diverse as human thought.’”

Judge Marbley also pointed out in his judgment the Parental Notification by Social Media Operators Act is not structured to prevent children from exploring the internet once they’ve received parental permission. It also doesn’t limit features, such as infinite scrolling, cited as the most detrimental to children.

“The approach is an untargeted one, as parents must only give one-time approval for the creation of an account, and parents and platforms are otherwise not required to protect against any of the specific dangers that social media might pose,” he said.

At the same time, Judge Marbley called it “eyebrow-raising” that the act makes an exception for children to access “widely recognized” news media outlets without a clear definition of what that means or how it would be enforced as part of the law.

Signed Into Law

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed the Social Media Parental Notification Act into law in July last year.

His administration spearheaded the measure to protect children’s mental health.

Following Judge Marbley’s ruling, Ohio Lt. Gov. Jon Husted said in a media statement the state was evaluating the next steps.

“It’s disappointing, but it will not deter us from our responsibility to protect children from exploitative social media algorithms that are causing a crisis of depression, suicide, bullying, and sexual exploitation among our children,” Mr. Husted said.

“These companies could solve this problem without passing new laws, but they refuse to do so. Because social media companies will not be responsible, we must hold them accountable.”

An array of experts have sounded the alarm over the harmful impacts of social media for years, especially when it comes to the effect it has on children and teens.
Last year, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy even issued an advisory expressing concerns about the potential impact of social media on the mental health of children and adolescents.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Stephen Katte
Stephen Katte
Author
Stephen Katte is a freelance journalist at The Epoch Times. Follow him on X @SteveKatte1
twitter
Author’s Selected Articles
Biden Awards Presidential Citizens Medal to 20, Including Liz Cheney
Jan 02, 2025
Biden Awards Presidential Citizens Medal to 20, Including Liz Cheney
New Orleans Attack Suspect Was US-Born, Inspired by ISIS: Biden
Jan 01, 2025
New Orleans Attack Suspect Was US-Born, Inspired by ISIS: Biden
Hegseth Promises to ‘Return Pentagon to the Warfighters’ If Confirmed as Defense Secretary
Dec 10, 2024
Hegseth Promises to ‘Return Pentagon to the Warfighters’ If Confirmed as Defense Secretary
US Charges 2 Former Syrian Officials With War Crimes
Dec 10, 2024
US Charges 2 Former Syrian Officials With War Crimes
Related Topics
court case
blocking social media
AD
Add to My List
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.