No Consensus in Senate on Bill to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent

The bill would set Daylight Saving Time as the permanent standard nationwide, but states could choose to opt out.

The U.S. Capitol building during the government shutdown on Oct. 22, 2025. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch Times

The U.S. Senate failed to reach a consensus on Oct. 28 to advance a bill that would make Daylight Saving Time permanent, once again stalling the bipartisan effort to end the practice of resetting clocks twice a year.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the lead sponsor of the “Sunshine Protection Act,“ took to the Senate floor to make the case for quick passage. Nearly two dozen states, he said, are ready to join Florida in choosing to ”lock the clock” should his bill become the law of the land.

“This bill is about states’ rights,” Scott said. “It allows the people of each state to choose what best fits their needs and the needs of their families.”

As Florida’s governor at the time, Scott signed legislation in 2018 to end clock switching across the Sunshine State, pending approval at the federal level.

Scott was joined by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a ranking member on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. In 2022, Whitehouse spearheaded an identical bill, which cleared the Senate but was never put to a vote in the House.

Quoting President Donald Trump, a vocal supporter of a fixed, year-round time, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who cosponsored the 2022 bill as a Florida senator, Whitehouse joked that although he doesn’t often agree with them, he certainly agrees about this.

Scott was also joined by Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who said that ending clock changes aligns with the broader effort to improve Americans’ health.

“A lot of Americans are taking their health more seriously by trying to eat healthier and to get more sleep,” Tuberville said on Oct. 28. “Switching the clock back and forth is the exact opposite of [the] Making America Healthy Again movement that [Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.] has championed.”

Not all senators were convinced. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) voiced his opposition, blocking Scott’s request to advance the bill by unanimous consent.

“If permanent [Daylight Saving Time] becomes the law of the land, it will again make winter a dark and abysmal time for millions of Americans,” Cotton said.

“For many Arkansans, permanent [Daylight Saving Time] would mean the sun wouldn’t rise until after 8:00 a.m. or even 8:30 a.m. during the dead of winter. The darkness of permanent savings time would be especially harmful for schoolchildren and working Americans.”

Among supporters of the move to end clock switching, there is debate about how to do it, whether by adopting permanent Daylight Saving Time, which creates later evenings but darker mornings, or permanent Standard Time, which does the opposite.

Scott’s proposal opts for the first option but would allow individual states to decide which time to remain on. That flexibility has raised concerns that it could create a confusing patchwork of time zones across the country.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, acknowledged these concerns during an April hearing on the merits of doing away with the biannual changing of the clocks.

“There are very real and complicated issues and countervailing arguments on both sides,” Cruz told the panel. “I think there is widespread agreement on locking the clock, but where to lock it?”