The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has decided to shutter its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) office, becoming the latest institution to adopt such changes under pressure from the federal government.
The office will be replaced by a standing committee intended to promote community-building and support, Kornbluth said. The committee will be led by staff but also include students and faculty members.
The office’s “signature programs” will be carried on by other departments on campus, according to the letter.
The decision followed an internal review of the school’s top-down approach to advancing DEI goals. The review found that current DEI initiatives received “real appreciation,” according to Kornbluth, but also showed “a broad desire to rethink how this work is done in practice.”
MIT’s neighbor, Harvard University, has come under intense federal scrutiny. The government has demanded that Harvard dismantle its diversity programs and, as part of an unprecedented effort to force systemic changes, seeks to terminate the university’s foreign student visa program and cancel all federal contracts with the university.
MIT’s DEI restructuring started in February, when its first-ever vice president for equity and inclusion, Karl Reid, stepped down after leading the equity office for just over a year.
After Reid’s departure, Kornbluth commissioned a working group of senior faculty and staff to review the university’s DEI framework. Their findings were presented last month to MIT’s academic council and formed the basis for the changes now underway.
Following the recommendations, Kornbluth said the school will remain committed to building a diverse community but “shift focus to community building at the local level.”
As part of the change, Reid’s former role will be eliminated, too.
“MIT is in the talent business,” she said. “Our success depends on attracting exceptionally talented people of every background, from across the country and around the world, and making sure everyone at MIT feels welcome and supported.”
The May 22 letter did not include a timeline for when the changes would take effect. The Epoch Times has reached out to MIT for comment.







