Military Aides Made Decision to Transfer Defense Secretary’s Authority During Hospitalization

‘The military aides made the decision to initiate the process,’ Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said in congressional testimony.
Military Aides Made Decision to Transfer Defense Secretary’s Authority During Hospitalization
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin testifies during a House Committee on Armed Services hearing to examine the circumstances surrounding the failure to communicate his absence during his recent hospitalization, on Capitol Hill in Washington on Feb. 29, 2024. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
Andrew Thornebrooke
2/29/2024
Updated:
2/29/2024
0:00

The decision to transfer Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s duties to his second-in-command in January was made by military aides and not the secretary himself, Mr. Austin testified at a congressional hearing on Feb. 29.

Mr. Austin’s functions and duties were transferred to Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks as he was transferred into critical care for a cancer-related operation.

He told the House Armed Services Committee that he wasn’t the one who made that decision, noting that he didn’t have access to secure communications in the critical care unit.

“The military aides made the decision to initiate the process,” Mr. Austin said.

“The issue was, No. 1, that they could not get to me, and No. 2, it was access to secure communications. It had nothing to do with my physical condition at the time.”

The revelation that he wasn’t the one to formally initiate the transfer of authorities during his hospital visit has raised concerns in Congress about the civil-military procedures, since it was military aides and not civilian personnel who made the decision.

Mr. Austin has also come under fire for not informing President Joe Biden of the hospitalization until two days after the transfer of authority and for not informing Ms. Hicks of the reason for the transfer.

At the time, Department of Defense policy didn’t require him to do either.

Nevertheless, the secretary apologized to lawmakers for not being more transparent about his cancer diagnosis in December 2023.

“I should have promptly informed the president, my team, the Congress, and the American people of my cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatment,” Mr. Austin said. “We did not handle this right and I did not handle it right.”

No Intention of Secrecy

Mr. Austin said he didn’t at any time direct his staff to keep the hospitalization a secret. Likewise, there was no gap in the ability of either himself or Ms. Hicks to conduct the authorities of his office, he said.

“At all times either I or the deputy secretary was in a position to conduct the duties of my office,” he said.

Mr. Austin’s hospitalization and the notification process that followed led to an investigation by the Pentagon inspector general.

The report ultimately found that Mr. Austin acted within policy, but the inspector general made eight recommendations for improving the associated processes in the future.

Mr. Austin said he has approved all eight recommendations, two of which have been enacted.

He noted that he was responsible for the “breakdown of notification,” although he reaffirmed that the transfer of authorities to Ms. Hicks had been conducted according to policy, with the Joint Chiefs of Staff being immediately notified.

Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) said the lack of transparency was unacceptable and that Mr. Austin should be held to greater account for not informing the president of his diagnosis.

“It’s totally unacceptable that it took three days to inform the president of the United States that the secretary of defense was in the hospital and not in control of the Pentagon,” Mr. Rogers said.

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the committee’s ranking Democrat member, agreed that the president would need to be informed in the future but underscored that the transfer of authorities was conducted properly in this case.

“The commander-in-chief should have all the broad range of information about what is going on with the Pentagon, even though in this instance there was no question who was in charge at that time,” Mr. Smith said. “The transfer was done in accordance with the law and done appropriately.”

Andrew Thornebrooke is a national security correspondent for The Epoch Times covering China-related issues with a focus on defense, military affairs, and national security. He holds a master's in military history from Norwich University.
twitter
Related Topics