BAYPORT, Minn.—A 35-year-old man who was sent to prison as a teenager for the 2004 killing of a man in a Minneapolis flower shop was set free Monday after a judge ruled the eyewitness evidence on which his conviction rested was unreliable.
Marvin Haynes, who was 16 at the time of the killing and had spent most of his life behind bars, was released from prison shortly after the judge’s ruling.
The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office said it agreed with defense attorneys that admitting the shaky evidence violated his constitutional rights during his 2005 trial for the killing of Randy Sherer, 55, who was shot during a robbery.
“I just want to thank everybody that supported me through this whole journey,” Mr. Haynes told reporters outside the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Stillwater. “And now y’all can recognize that I’m actually innocent.”
Mr. Haynes later appeared at a news conference at the courthouse in Minneapolis with his attorneys, family members, and Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. He said his next step would be to visit his mother, who had not been able to visit him in prison for the last three or four years since suffering a stroke. He said he now hopes to get a job and get his life back in order. And he recalled how get got the news on his birthday last Wednesday that Ms. Moriarty had agreed his conviction should be set aside.
“I shed tears,” he said. “I haven’t cried so much in 19 years. I’m so excited. Overwhelmed with emotion.”
Ms. Moriarty told reporters she concluded after reviewing the case records that Mr. Haynes was innocent and his prosecution was a “terrible injustice.” She said his conviction depended almost entirely on eyewitness identification and there was no forensic evidence, such as fingerprints or DNA, nor video connecting him to the crime.
“We inflicted harm on Mr. Haynes and his family, and also on Randy Sherer, the victim, his family, and the community,“ Ms. Moriarty said. ”We cannot undo the trauma experienced by those impacted by this prosecution. But today we have taken a step towards righting this wrong.”
Ms. Moriarty said nearly 28 percent of cases nationally in which convictions are thrown out involve problems with eyewitness identification.
Judge William Koch held that absent the eyewitness evidence, which he said was unconstitutionally admitted, “it is doubtful there would have been sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.” He dismissed all charges with prejudice, meaning they can’t be filed again.
Judge Koch said in his order that Mr. Haynes’ attorneys, from the Innocence Project, showed he did not match the physical description provided by the primary eyewitness. Mr. Haynes was “significantly younger” than the description of the killer, about 50 pounds (22 kilograms) lighter and “significantly shorter,” the judge said. Mr. Haynes also had “much longer hair” than how the witness described the attacker, and his “manner of speech was not similar.”
The judge also found problems with how investigators conducted a photo lineup that did not include Mr. Haynes. The person the witness initially identified, saying she was 75–80 percent sure, was in another state at the time of the killing. Investigators used an old photo in another lineup from when Mr. Haynes had close-cropped hair, but he had grown it long since them. The eyewitness did not identify Mr. Haynes as the killer until a third lineup and in her trial testimony.
Ms. Moriarty noted that one of the lead investigators in the original case, retired Minneapolis Police Lt. Michael Keefe, testified during a recent evidentiary hearing that he objected to the lineup procedures at the time but was overruled.
During the hearing, Mr. Haynes maintained his innocence and four of his sisters testified he was asleep at home shortly before the killing.
Attorney Andrew Markquart, of the Great North Innocence Project, thanked Ms. Moriarty and her office for taking a serious look at the evidence and agreeing that Mr. Haynes’ conviction could not stand. He welcomed that Mr. Haynes will now get to spend “a very merry Christmas” with his family.
“This is someone who has every right in the world to be bitter, to be angry,“ Mr. Markquart said. ”But he’s not. And then he carries himself with this remarkable sense of hope and positivity that is so admirable.”
It’s “well established that subjecting witnesses to multiple viewings of a suspect risks tainting the identification,” the Innocence Project noted.
At the time of Mr. Haynes’ conviction, Ms. Moriarty wasn’t the county attorney. It was Amy Klobuchar, who is now Minnesota’s senior U.S. senator. Ms. Klobuchar came under scrutiny in 2020 for her office’s role in prosecuting another high-profile case of a teenager sentenced to life in prison, that of Myon Burrell, in which eyewitness identification was also a major issue. His sentence was later commuted to time served. Ms. Klobuchar’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Ms. Moriarty, who was formerly the county’s chief public defender, said she was “deeply sorry” for all the opportunities Mr. Haynes missed while he spent more than half his life in prison.
“The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office bears responsibility for taking almost 20 years away from Marvin Haynes and his family,“ Ms. Moriarty said. ”We have deeply devoted professionals in this office. We’re committed to doing the right thing every day. And doing the right thing sometimes means we must seek to undo the harms of the past and not defend them. And that is what we have tried to do today.”
The Minnesota Legislature in 2020 tightened the state’s procedures for lineups in an effort to protect against witness misidentifications. The bipartisan legislation signed by Gov. Tim Walz requires law enforcement agencies to adopt science-based best practices, recognizing that eyewitnesses can be unreliable because memories can be faulty. It had support from the Innocence Project and the state’s prosecutors.
The changes include requiring that investigators who conduct lineups be unaware of the suspect’s identity to avoid suggesting it to the witness. They must tell the witness that the perpetrator may or may not be present in the lineup. They should put “fillers” into lineups who aren’t suspects but match the witness’ description. And officials should document the witness’s level of confidence right after they make an identification. Those rules are similar to standards advocated by the National Academy of Sciences, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, and the U.S. Department of Justice.
