Judge Will Not Admit Some Evidence About George Floyd’s Criminal History in Trial

Judge Will Not Admit Some Evidence About George Floyd’s Criminal History in Trial
Former Minneapolis police officers (clockwise from top left) Derek Chauvin, Tou Thao, Thomas Lane, and J. Alexander Kueng pose in a combination of booking photographs from the Minnesota Department of Corrections and Hennepin County Jail in Minneapolis, Minn. Minnesota Department of Corrections and Hennepin County Sheriff's Office/Handout via Reuters
Tom Ozimek
Tom Ozimek
Reporter
|Updated:

The judge in the trial against four ex-Minneapolis police officers who stand accused of George Floyd’s murder—or in its aiding and abetting—will not allow as evidence some records of Floyd’s history, specifically a prior conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.

Attorney Eric Nelson, who represents Derek Chauvin, the former officer who knelt on Floyd’s neck before he died, filed a motion on Aug. 28 (pdf) for the admission of evidence relating to several incidents, including one in 2019 in which Floyd admitted to “daily” drug use and another in which he was allegedly involved in selling illegal drugs and, when approached by police, “placed drugs in his mouth in an attempt to avoid arrest, and swallowed them.” The motion states that when Floyd interacted with the officers, “he engaged in diversionary behavior such as crying and acted irrationally.”
Tom Ozimek
Tom Ozimek
Reporter
Tom Ozimek is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times. He has a broad background in journalism, deposit insurance, marketing and communications, and adult education.
twitter
Related Topics