Judge Temporarily Blocks DOJ’s Access to Key Evidence in Comey Case

The judge said Comey’s former attorney, Daniel Richman, will likely succeed on the merits of his claim that the government violated his Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Temporarily Blocks DOJ’s Access to Key Evidence in Comey Case
Former FBI Director James Comey speaks to the media after giving a private deposition to the House Judiciary and House Government and Oversight committees in Washington on Dec. 7, 2018. Joshua Roberts/Reuters
|Updated:
0:00

A federal judge on Dec. 6 barred prosecutors from accessing evidence seized from ex-FBI Director James Comey’s former attorney, complicating the Department of Justice’s bid to revive a case against him.

In a four-page ruling, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted Daniel Richman’s bid for a temporary restraining order after he filed a lawsuit alleging that prosecutors unlawfully retained materials seized from his electronic devices amid the probe into Comey, who was charged with making false statements to Congress in 2020. The indictment against Comey was dismissed by another judge on Nov. 24.

The judge stated that Richman is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that the government violated his Fourth Amendment rights when it retained “a complete copy of files on his personal computer” and searched that image without a warrant.

Kollar-Kotelly said the government has not yet indicated who holds custody of the seized materials and that neither Richman nor the court can determine who the custodian is.

“Given that the custody and control of this material is the central issue in this matter, uncertainty about its whereabouts weighs in favor of acting promptly to preserve the status quo,” the judge stated.

Kollar-Kotelly ordered the government to “identify, segregate, and secure” the image of Richman’s personal computer, along with his email accounts and other materials taken from his electronic devices, and barred prosecutors from accessing those files without the court’s permission. The order is set to take effect at 12 p.m. ET on Dec. 8.

The Epoch Times reached out to the Justice Department and Richman’s lawyer for comment but did not receive a response.

Prosecutors had relied on those files to indict Comey on charges of making false statements and obstructing Congress in connection with his 2020 testimony regarding FBI officials anonymously providing information to news outlets.

According to the motion Richman filed on Nov. 26, he had various interactions with the government between 2017 and 2020 regarding his legal representation of Comey, Comey’s handling of potentially classified information, and media-related communications.

Richman said he agreed to let investigators image his personal computer during the investigation, and the government later obtained warrants authorizing further searches of the image and of his email and iCloud accounts.

In his motion, Richman argued that the government had violated his Fourth Amendment rights by seizing more materials than he had permitted and retaining all the files for four years after the investigation concluded in 2021.

Last month, Judge Cameron McGowan Currie of the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina dismissed the indictments against Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, holding that the prosecutor who brought the cases had been invalidly appointed. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the Department of Justice planned to file an appeal.
Reuters contributed to this report.