Jan. 6 ‘Raindrop Theory’ of Collective Guilt Is Unconstitutional, Defense Attorney Says

‘A defendant cannot be found guilty merely as a result of being near someone else committing a crime,’ attorney John Pierce wrote.
Jan. 6 ‘Raindrop Theory’ of Collective Guilt Is Unconstitutional, Defense Attorney Says
Demonstrators outside the U.S. Capitol as Congress debated the 2020 presidential election Electoral College vote certification on Jan. 6, 2021. Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images
Joseph M. Hanneman
Updated:
0:00

A frequently used Department of Justice claim that Jan. 6 protesters share equal guilt for rioting, like raindrops that join to create a flood, is unconstitutional and should be banned from court, a defense attorney argues.

“The criminal law in the United States requires that to prove a person guilty of a crime, prosecutors must prove the individual guilt of that particular defendant,” wrote attorney John Pierce.

Joseph M. Hanneman
Joseph M. Hanneman
Reporter
Joseph M. Hanneman is a former reporter for The Epoch Times who focussed on the January 6 Capitol incursion and its aftermath, as well as general Wisconsin news. In 2022, he helped to produce "The Real Story of Jan. 6," an Epoch Times documentary about the events that day. Joe has been a journalist for nearly 40 years.
Related Topics