IN DEPTH: Federal, State Lawsuits Seek Constitutional Clarity on ‘Racial Gerrymanders’

Pending court rulings could see voters in some states cast 2024 ballots in different legislative districts to 2022.
IN DEPTH: Federal, State Lawsuits Seek Constitutional Clarity on ‘Racial Gerrymanders’
A line of people wait outside the federal courthouse in Birmingham, Ala., on Aug. 14, 2023, to watch a redistricting hearing. Kim Chandler/AP Photo
John Haughey
John Haughey
Reporter
|Updated:
0:00

It’s a fine litigative line: Gerrymandering by a majority party for political purposes is legal because elections have consequences. But if the consequences of gerrymandering predetermine election results by diluting the voting efficacy of racial minorities, then it is illegal.

Defining when “racial gerrymandering” is constitutional and when it is not is a nub of contention in dozens of proceeding and pending redistricting lawsuits nationwide. These range from how a Texas county crafted its county commission precincts to a South Carolina case challenging the state Legislature’s congressional district map to be heard before the United States Supreme Court in October.

John Haughey
John Haughey
Reporter
John Haughey is an award-winning Epoch Times reporter who covers U.S. elections, U.S. Congress, energy, defense, and infrastructure. Mr. Haughey has more than 45 years of media experience. You can reach John via email at [email protected]
twitter
Related Topics