House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington Leads Amicus Brief in Support of Texas in US v. Texas

Federal judges, including those on the nation’s highest court, are likely to decide if state authorities can act to repel an illegal immigrant invasion.
House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington Leads Amicus Brief in Support of Texas in US v. Texas
Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) speaks at a press conference on border security at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Feb. 14, 2024. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
Mark Tapscott
Mark Tapscott
Senior Congressional Correspondent
|Updated:
0:00

Federal officials cannot constitutionally prevent Texas authorities from protecting their citizens against the invasion of illegal immigrants crossing into the Lone Star State that President Joe Biden made possible on his first day in office in 2021, according to an amicus brief led by House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) and joined by 45 House Republicans.

“Congress’s regulation of immigration cannot preempt a State’s valid invocation of its sovereign power, ‘without the consent of Congress,’ to ‘engage in War’ if  ‘actually invaded.’ To the extent that there is a conflict between Texas’s valid exercise of its constitutional war power and the Immigration and Nationality Act (‘INA’), it is the latter that must give way. To decide otherwise would read ‘without the consent of Congress’ out of the State Self-Defense Clause,” the representatives told the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas in the U.S. v. State of Texas in the brief, which was made public on Feb. 14.
Mark Tapscott
Mark Tapscott
Senior Congressional Correspondent
Mark Tapscott is an award-winning senior Congressional correspondent for The Epoch Times. He covers Congress, national politics, and policy. Mr. Tapscott previously worked for Washington Times, Washington Examiner, Montgomery Journal, and Daily Caller News Foundation.
twitter
Related Topics