Hollywood Writers Union Files Separate Lawsuit to Stop Paramount–Warner Bros. Merger

The newest lawsuit alleged that the deal would suppress competition and creative diversity in film and television.
Hollywood Writers Union Files Separate Lawsuit to Stop Paramount–Warner Bros. Merger
Paramount Pictures Studios in Los Angeles on April 28, 2026. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times
|Updated:
0:00
A union representing Hollywood writers sued Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery, becoming the second group to claim the $110 billion acquisition violates federal antitrust laws this week.

The Writers Guild of America (WGA)—representing about 18,000 writers in film, television, news, and digital media nationwide—says the merger would cause specific harm to writers.

“With fewer competitors, the merged Paramount-Warner Bros. entity would have both the incentive and the ability to lower costs by suppressing writers’ wages and reducing output,” the WGA said in a July 14 statement. “Writers will be paid less and have fewer employment opportunities.”

The union also claims the merger threatens the economic and creative health of the American entertainment industry.

Eliminating Warner Bros. as a competing studio, and creating a new dominant firm would result in a reduction in quality and variety of theatrical films and television series, the union said.

The WGA also alleges the merger would increase Paramount’s ability to coordinate with other companies and “suppress competition” for writers’ work.

“This would eliminate competition in an already consolidated industry, threatening the livelihoods of entertainment workers and the creative diversity of TV and film,” said WGA-West President Michele Mulroney.

Screenwriter Adam McKay, who wrote “Don’t Look Up, and “Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy,” and other notable films, said independent studios are becoming rare.

“The remaining studios today are no longer independent creative entities,” McKay wrote as a witness in the complaint. “They are divisions of massive conglomerates with political exposure and financial relationships extending far beyond the entertainment industry.

“Those pressures shape what gets made. In my more than thirty years in this industry, the creative mandate has never been as subordinate to the corporate mandate as it is today,” he added.

The Warner Bros. logo is displayed on a water tower at Warner Bros. Studio in Burbank, Calif., on Sept. 12, 2025. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
The Warner Bros. logo is displayed on a water tower at Warner Bros. Studio in Burbank, Calif., on Sept. 12, 2025. Mario Tama/Getty Images
California is also leading a 12-state lawsuit filed July 13 against the merger. That case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin in Oakland, California.

Plaintiffs are asking the judge for an immediate temporary injunction to block the merger while the lawsuit proceeds. The first hearing is scheduled for Friday.

Paramount responded to the antitrust lawsuit filed Monday, saying it was a “misrepresentation of competition in the entertainment industry today.”

The company also said the merger would create “a stronger, well-capitalized, creative-first media company that is better positioned to compete with companies like Netflix that have come to dominate the industry of audiences, premium content, and creative talent.”

Paramount said the company planned to continue to fight against any attempt to derail the deal.

Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Jill McLaughlin
Jill McLaughlin
Author
Jill McLaughlin is an award-winning journalist covering politics, environment, and statewide issues. She has been a reporter and editor for newspapers in Oregon, Nevada, and New Mexico. Jill was born in Yosemite National Park and enjoys the majestic outdoors, traveling, golfing, and hiking.