Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said on July 30 that he was offended and disappointed after President Donald Trump called on him to eliminate the practice of giving senators in a nominee’s home state the ability to veto nominations.
“I was offended by what the president said, and I’m disappointed in that it would result in personal insults. Now we’re here to do business, that’s a very important part of this committee’s work, to do our constitutional duties of reviewing people that require Senate confirmation.”
The process was narrowed by Grassley in 2017 to exclude nominees to U.S. appeals courts, but it is still in place for district court nominees.
“[Grassley] could solve the ‘Blue Slip’ problem we are having with respect to the appointment of Highly Qualified Judges and U.S. Attorneys, with a mere flick of the pen,” he wrote. “Put simply, the President of the United States will never be permitted to appoint the person of his choice because of an ancient, and probably Unconstitutional, ‘CUSTOM.’”
Only nominees who are Democrats or weak Republicans can make it through the process for certain states represented by senators from the Democratic Party, such as California and New York, according to Trump.
Historically, a small number of nominees who had split or no support from home-state senators have still been confirmed, including several during Joe Biden’s presidency and multiple during Trump’s first term.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said on July 30 that he appreciated Grassley’s comments.
“You have stated publicly that you support the blue slip ... and I followed that standard as well in the four years that I chaired this committee,” Durbin said.
“Maybe it’s inside baseball and too much minutiae, but it really relates to the relationship between the majority and the minority on this committee, and the basic rights that we have given for district court judges to the senators that we serve with.”







