The program establishes “common race and gender-based employment practices across the legal industry,” the letter said.
According to the FTC, to be eligible for Mansfield Certification, a law firm must agree to consider talent pools for promotions and leadership opportunities that comprise at least 30 percent of members of underrepresented racial and other groups.
To achieve certification, law firms participate in monthly Mansfield meetings to discuss common labor-market challenges, Ferguson wrote in the letter.
As a result of the process, the firms have reportedly met the 30 percent benchmark for external hiring and internal promotion.
“Millions of American citizens participate in our economy both as workers and as consumers. The antitrust laws protect them from anticompetitive employer agreements in labor markets just as much as they do from anticompetitive seller agreements in product markets,” the letter said.
The initiative is an “inclusive sourcing process” rather than a diverse slate policy, Diversity Lab said.
The program does not dictate or require that underrepresented groups be selected for any leadership role or activity. Nor does adopting the initiative result in any individual being excluded from employment consideration on the basis of gender, race, or other demographic characteristics.
“Mansfield does not, explicitly or implicitly, ask employers or their decision-makers to make any selection or employment decision because of a demographic trait. As always, employment and advancement decisions remain outside of the scope of Mansfield and should be based solely on merit,” according to Diversity Lab.
The agency reminded law firms that unfair and anticompetitive employment practices also include collusion or unlawful coordination among entities regarding DEI metrics.
“Potentially anticompetitive collusion between law firms on DEI metrics can include quotas by which they agree to compose panels of job candidates based on race, sex, or other personal characteristics other than the candidate’s merit, or by which law firms agree to make final decisions about hiring and promotions based on those personal characteristics,” it said.
“Such agreements can distort competition for labor in legal professions, including along dimensions like hiring decisions, pay, and promotions.”
Tackling DEI
Since assuming office, President Donald Trump has signed orders aimed at dismantling DEI policies.DEI and DEIA policies “undermine our national unity, as they deny, discredit, and undermine the traditional American values of hard work, excellence, and individual achievement in favor of an unlawful, corrosive, and pernicious identity-based spoils system,” Trump wrote.
He ordered all agencies to “enforce our longstanding civil-rights laws and to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.”
In its statement, the FTC said the letters’ recipients are among the largest law firms in the country, collectively employing over 50,000 attorneys who are subject to Diversity Lab’s Mansfield criteria.
“Those who engage in blatant discrimination and other activities inconsistent with the interests of the United States should not have access to our Nation’s secrets nor be deemed responsible stewards of any Federal funds,” the president wrote.
Another law firm mentioned in the FTC letter, Latham & Watkins, also entered into a similar settlement with the Trump administration.
Law firm Perkins Coie, which sued the administration after being named in a presidential executive action, is included among the 42 law firms targeted in the FTC letter.
The Epoch Times reached out to Paul Weiss, Latham & Watkins, Perkins Coie, and Diversity Lab for comment, but did not receive a response by publication time.







