Former Prosecutor Details Why She Resigned From Durham’s Trump-Russia Probe

State Supreme Court nominee in Connecticut says AG Bill Barr’s ‘public comments violated DOJ guidelines.’
Former Prosecutor Details Why She Resigned From Durham’s Trump-Russia Probe
Acting U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy leaves law offices in Washington on May 15, 2009. (Haraz N. Ghanbari/AP Photo)
9/21/2023
Updated:
9/21/2023
0:00

A former U.S. Attorney for Connecticut, Nora Dannehy, provided testimony on Wednesday about her resignation from Special Counsel John Durham’s inquiry during an approval hearing for a place on the state’s Supreme Court.

Ms. Dannehy made national headlines in 2020 when she resigned from the team conducting John Durham’s report into the FBI investigation of former President Donald Trump’s supposed links to Russia, although she provided no specific details at the time.
In January this year, The New York Times reported that her resignation was the “culmination of a series of disputes” over prosecutorial ethics with Mr. Durham and Attorney General Bill Barr.

Testifying at her Judiciary Committee hearing in Hartford, Connecticut, Ms. Dannehy broadly confirmed those reports, explaining that her “conscience did not allow [her] to remain.”

She insisted, however, that her resignation was not politically motivated.

“Before I get to the crux of what caused my resignation, I do want to address the issue of first initially joining what some had labeled the ‘Trump DOJ.’ I didn’t return to the Trump Department of Justice,” Ms. Dannehy said. “Politics never played a role in how I was expected to do my job.”

“My experience during the Russia investigation, my decision to resign, I hope reflects my unwavering commitment to the rule of law and to fairness and impartiality,” she continued.

“I had been taught and spent my entire career at the Department of Justice conducting any investigation in an objective and apolitical manner,” Ms. Dannehy told state Rep. Steven Strafstrom, the Democratic co-chairman of the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee, at the beginning of the three-hour hearing.

According to The TimesDannehy was particularly troubled by a segment on Fox News where Barr suggested that some officials may even face prosecution for their role in the Mueller investigation.

“In the spring and summer of 2020, I had growing concern that this Russia investigation was not being conducted in that way,” she said. “Attorney General Barr began to speak more publicly and specifically about the ongoing criminal investigation.

“I thought his public comments violated DOJ guidelines.”

Ms. Dannehy explained she was concerned that Mr. Barr’s plan to release a report about the ongoing investigation risked influencing the 2020 presidential election.

“Publicly, he would not rule out releasing that report before the presidential election,” she said. “I had never been asked to write a report about an investigation that was not yet complete. I then saw a version of a draft report, the conclusions of which I strongly disagreed with.”

“Writing a report—and particularly the draft I saw—violated long-standing principles of the Department of Justice. Furthermore, the Department of Justice has a long-standing policy of not taking any public actions in the time leading up to an election that might influence that election.”

“I simply couldn’t be part of it, so I resigned,” she said. ”It was the most difficult personal and professional decision I’ve had to make.”

Durham’s report concluded that the FBI had demonstrated significant failings throughout their investigation. These included excessive confirmation bias and a “serious lack of analytical rigor.” It also recommended “a position for an FBI agent or lawyer to provide oversight of politically sensitive investigations” in the future.
Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont, who previously employed Ms. Dannehy as his legal counsel, announced her nomination earlier this month, describing her as “a woman of integrity who pursues justice wherever the evidence may lead.”

“Nora Dannehy is a person who knows what she knows, but you also know that she cares,” Mr. Lamont wrote.

“She cares deeply about justice. She’s going to be an extraordinary associate justice on the Supreme Court.”

The Judiciary Committee voted 30–4 in favor of her nomination, which moves to the state’s General Assembly next week for full confirmation.