A federal appeals court rejected a health care union’s request that the judges reconsider their decision upholding the right of nurses not to be required to fund the labor group’s political lobbying.
The United Nurses and Allied Professionals (UNAP) union had asked the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit to reconsider its September 2020 ruling upholding Rhode Island nurse Jeannette Geary’s right not to be charged assessments used to cover the costs of lobbying and other political activities.
In its September decision, the judges, including former Supreme Court Justice David Souter, said they saw “no convincing argument that legislative lobbying is not a ‘political’ activity’” for which Geary can’t be forced to fund.
The September decision also upheld the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruling in Geary’s favor, saying the board was correct that Supreme Court precedent dictated that nonmembers could never be required to fund union lobbying.
Geary has been represented pro bono throughout her fight, which began in 2009, by attorneys from the National Right to Work Foundation (NRTWF).
There are currently 27 states that have adopted “Right to Work” laws that guarantee an individual no person can be forced to join a union as a condition of employment.
Previously, under President Barack Obama, the NLRB had ruled against Geary in 2012. But then, in a March 2019 decision, the board reversed itself, saying, according to the NRTWF statement: “The NLRB ruled 3–1 that union officials violate workers’ rights by forcing nonmembers to fund any union lobbying activities.