FBI Opened Ashli Babbitt Investigation Within a Week of Her Jan. 6 Death

FBI investigation listed Ms. Babbitt’s ‘potential violations of federal law’ 8 days after she was killed by Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd.
FBI Opened Ashli Babbitt Investigation Within a Week of Her Jan. 6 Death
Moments before being fatally shot, Ashli Babbitt confronts three police offers for not stopping the vandalism outside the U.S. House. (Tayler Hansen/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
Joseph M. Hanneman
4/10/2024
Updated:
4/10/2024
0:00

Ashli Babbitt, the California Air Force veteran fatally shot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was investigated by the FBI for “potential violations” of federal law including felony rioting and civil disorder, new records reveal.

The FBI posted a 69-page PDF document with heavily redacted reports from an investigation of Ms. Babbitt opened on Jan. 14, 2021, more than a week after she died from a single gunshot fired by U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd.

A summary sheet dated Jan. 7—before the investigation was formally opened—said “two subjects were shot” at the Capitol on Jan. 6 “with one fatal injury.” The reference to a second gunshot injury is unclear since Ms. Babbitt was the only person reported to have been shot at the Capitol that day.

The investigation document was posted to the website of The Vault, the FBI’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) library. The investigation of Ms. Babbitt was opened by the FBI’s San Diego Field Office.
Its public release was a response to Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice, a FOIA lawsuit filed on Sept. 20, 2021. Each page in the PDF was stamped “21-cv-2462,” the federal case number for the suit.

“We are reviewing the documents now, which I understand were produced in response to our FOIA lawsuits,” Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, told The Epoch Times in an April 10 email.

Since Ms. Babbitt could not be charged with a crime—the report makes clear that she died on Jan. 6—it’s not clear why the document lists four federal statutes under “potential violations of federal law.” The justification section of the document is redacted.

The potential violations list includes “Title 18 U.S.C §2101 - Riots,” a five-year felony charge that has not been brought against any of the 1,387 people arrested by the FBI since Jan. 6.
Other “potential violations” included felony civil disorder (18 U.S.C §231), misdemeanor charges of unlawful entry (18 U.S.C §1752a), and disorderly conduct/injuries to property (40 U.S.C §5104), according to a Jan. 14, 2021, document included in the PDF.

‘Unlawfully Entered’

A criminal inquiry was started “based on photographic and video evidence that Ashli Elizabeth Babbitt unlawfully entered the United States Capitol Building, a restricted building, on 6 January 2021,” the report said.

Ms. Babbitt “was fatally shot by police as she attempted to leap through the broken window of a door inside the Capitol,” the document stated.

Video shot by at least four journalists in the hallway showed Ms. Babbitt climbing into the window frame but footage did not show her jumping.

Garret O'Boyle, a suspended FBI special agent and whistleblower who testified before the U.S. House in 2023, said he found it “very strange” that the FBI started a criminal investigation based on the alleged Jan. 6 actions of the deceased Ms. Babbitt.

“This makes no sense,” Mr. O'Boyle told The Epoch Times. “Why open a case on a dead person to allege crimes she may have been charged with? Makes no sense at all.”

Mr. O'Boyle and Steve Friend—a former FBI special agent who blew the whistle on what he called the bureau’s manipulation of case statistics to push a domestic terror narrative—said such a probe might make sense if it was about a conspiracy involving associates.
Ashli Babbitt (upper right) begins to fall back after being shot by U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd at the Capitol, on Jan. 6, 2021. (Sam Montoya/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
Ashli Babbitt (upper right) begins to fall back after being shot by U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd at the Capitol, on Jan. 6, 2021. (Sam Montoya/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
Ms. Babbitt traveled to Washington alone on Jan. 5. She attended former President Donald Trump’s speech at the Ellipse and then walked to the Capitol. She was alone that day, not part of a protest group, Ms. Babbitt’s widower, Aaron Babbitt, previously told The Epoch Times.

Mr. Friend told The Epoch Times that an investigation of Ms. Babbitt’s actions on Jan. 6 is “completely ridiculous” considering she is dead. Ms. Babbitt, 35, of San Diego, was shot at 2:44 p.m. on Jan. 6 in the hallway outside of the House speaker’s lobby on the second level of the Capitol.

Mr. Byrd shot her in the left anterior shoulder below the clavicle just as she emerged from a broken glass side panel of the speaker’s lobby entrance. She was pronounced dead at a Washington hospital at 3:15 p.m. that day.

Mr. Byrd has said he fired the shot because he feared his life was in danger. A $30 million wrongful-death lawsuit, filed by Ms. Babbitt’s estate and Mr. Babbitt, however, said the shooting was an “ambush murder.”
An investigation of the fatal shooting conducted by the Metropolitan Police Department also included information on laws possibly broken by Ms. Babbitt, but the June 2021 MPD report called them “violations that led to police contact.”

Informant Video?

The FBI document detailed digital copies of four videos of the fatal shooting. The description of the video files was included on a form the FBI uses to document information from informants.

It’s not clear if the video files were provided or shot by an informant or “confidential human source” as the FBI calls them.

The report makes reference to tips about Ms. Babbitt that came through the FBI’s Capitol violence website, although the details in each instance are redacted.

Graphic videos of the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt might have come from an FBI informant, based on this document included in a newly released tranche of FBI files. (FBI/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
Graphic videos of the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt might have come from an FBI informant, based on this document included in a newly released tranche of FBI files. (FBI/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)

It also includes details from an FBI interview of a man who served with Ms. Babbitt in the U.S. Air Force who said she “loved her family and loved her country.”

The heavily redacted report indicates that FBI special agents interviewed or otherwise received information from tipsters, including on Jan. 7, 11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, and 28. The details of the tips are redacted in the report.

On April 15, 2021, agents interviewed someone who knew Ms. Babbitt from her time in the U.S. Air Force. The individual described Ms. Babbitt as “very outgoing, opinionated, loud, very intelligent, loyal, sweet, very loving and caring.”

“At times, Babbitt was not a fan of her chain of command and made her views known,” the man said, according to the FBI document. “Babbitt was a leader rather than a follower and liked being her own boss. Consequently, she was happy running her pool company in California,” the report said. “Babbitt loved her family and loved her country.”

Ashli Babbitt was a military police officer in the U.S. Air Force and Army National Guard. (Courtesy of Micki Witthoeft)
Ashli Babbitt was a military police officer in the U.S. Air Force and Army National Guard. (Courtesy of Micki Witthoeft)

The man judged that Ms. Babbitt “likely recognized” that entering the Capitol was unauthorized and “knew the risk,” the report said. “In that situation, [he] assessed that Babbitt followed the crowd and felt secure being amongst like-minded individuals.”

The man “judged that her leadership nature may have taken hold when she attempted to enter a new room within the Capitol where she was shot,” the report said.

Ms. Babbitt “likely did not know the risk of passing through the window,” the man said. Ms. Babbitt would never “go after someone physically,” he added.

The man told agents he was not very familiar with Ms. Babbitt’s personal views, saying she was “not political.” He said he knew she had voted for President Barack Obama.

The man “was frustrated by media portrayals of Babbitt as being associated with white nationalists, which was not accurate,” the report said.

It is expected that the FBI will be releasing more Babbitt investigative records. Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit against the FBI on Jan. 17 in the U.S. District Court in San Diego, demanding all of the records it has on Mr. and Mrs. Babbitt.

Ms. Babbitt’s estate and Mr. Babbitt filed separate FOIA requests with the FBI in late February 2023. Those requests were denied, and an appeal did not yield the production of any records, the lawsuit said.

The dozens of pages of records released by the FBI on April 7 are as significant for what they don’t say as the information they reveal.

Nowhere in the document does Mr. Byrd’s name appear, or any notation that there was an ongoing use-of-force investigation on Mr. Byrd. The report merely states Ms. Babbitt “was fatally shot.”

Various videos that surfaced in the wake of Jan. 6 show that Ms. Babbitt did not engage in rioting, violence, or vandalism at the Capitol. She berated three Capitol police officers, who were guarding the doors of the speaker’s lobby, for not calling for backup when violence broke out in the hallway.
Shortly after Zachary Alam used a riot helmet to smash out glass panes in the doors and side panel, Ms. Babbitt spun him around and landed a left hook to his nose. She then climbed into the window panel where she was shot.
Joseph M. Hanneman is a reporter for The Epoch Times with a focus on the January 6 Capitol incursion and its aftermath, as well as general Wisconsin news. In 2022, he helped to produce "The Real Story of Jan. 6," an Epoch Times documentary about the events that day. Joe has been a journalist for nearly 40 years. He can be reached at: [email protected]
twitter