Economist Warns Government Could Be Main ‘Bottleneck’ in AI Progress

Economist Warns Government Could Be Main ‘Bottleneck’ in AI Progress
Four Twitter accounts apparently generated by artificial intelligence software, displayed on a laptop in Helsinki on June 12, 2023. (Olivier Morin/AFP)
Nathan Worcester
12/6/2023
Updated:
12/6/2023
0:00

While the headlines often emphasize the danger of rapid innovations in artificial intelligence (AI), one economist told Congress on Dec. 6 that the risks from AI to government are outweighed by the risks of not implementing it fast enough.

“Managing the AI transition will require the government to not only adopt AI aggressively but may even force Congress to rethink the configuration of our administrative and regulatory agencies from the ground up,” said Samuel Hammond, a senior economist with the Foundation for American Innovation, formerly the Lincoln Network.

“Incremental reform is unlikely to suffice,” he continued, warning that business as usual could “risk government becoming the primary bottleneck to technological progress.”

Mr. Hammond was speaking at a House Oversight hearing focused on the White House’s AI policy.

It comes after President Joe Biden signed a new executive order (EO) on what he called the “safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence” on Oct. 31.

Two days later, the Office of Management and Budget, the White House’s linchpin for translating its policies into actions by federal agencies, issued a draft guidance on the order that was open to public comment until Dec. 5.

While he praised elements of President Biden’s EO, Mr. Hammond said he was concerned that it “does not go far enough” in facilitating government applications of AI, arguing that the order is constrained by “an excess focus on hypothetical harms and an even deeper failure of imagination.”

He drew attention to Google’s DeepMind, which was recently leveraged to identify 2.2 million new crystal structures.

In their Nature paper outlining the finding, DeepMind researchers described it as “an order-of-magnitude expansion in stable materials known to humanity.”

Mr. Hammond questioned whether regulators are prepared for a coming flood of discoveries made possible by AI.

“Is the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] prepared to handle an order of magnitude increase in drug discovery?” he asked.

The economist suggested that at least some tasks performed by the government could be automated, though he shied away from suggesting bureaucrats’ jobs should be eliminated.

“Much of the work performed in government bureaucracies is especially low-hanging fruit for AI,” he said in written testimony, arguing that such tools could “augment employee productivity and free up human resources for higher value uses, reducing waste and enhancing capacity simultaneously.”

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who chairs the cybersecurity subcommittee that held the hearing, noted that the EO invoked the Defense Production Act, a law first passed during the Truman administration to mobilize industries during the Korean War.

She said the greatest AI-related threat for the United States was the possibility of allowing China to surpass it.

“All other risks seem tame by comparison,” she said.

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) speaks with reporters in Washington on Oct. 16, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) speaks with reporters in Washington on Oct. 16, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

Ms. Mace asked Mr. Hammond if national security could be jeopardized by the government’s sluggishness on AI.

“I think it’s both a national security issue and a sort of good government issue,” he said.

The economist pointed out one among many troubling precedents in the government’s responsiveness to new technology: the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) Individual Master File, the system it uses to handle Individual Income Tax forms, was coded during the Kennedy administration in a now-ancient programming language.

Mr. Hammond’s research has received backing from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, created by a founder of the defunct computer hardware firm HP.
Foundation for American Innovation has received funding from Democracy Fund, founded by Democrat donor and eBay founder Pierre Omidyar.

More conventionally conservative foundations, including the Searle Freedom Trust, have also donated to that organization.

Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the minority leader of the cybersecurity subcommittee, noted that AI has made its way to Capitol Hill.

“Even members of Congress are using ChatGPT,” he said.

Nathan Worcester covers national politics for The Epoch Times and has also focused on energy and the environment. Nathan has written about everything from fusion energy and ESG to Biden's classified documents and international conservative politics. He lives and works in Chicago. Nathan can be reached at [email protected].
twitter
truth