The Justice Department has asked an appeals court to reconsider its earlier ruling that Alina Habba was not validly serving as acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey.
Accompanying the department’s petition was a declaration in which Habba said she would return to leading the U.S. attorney’s office if the en banc court ruled in her favor.
The three-judge panel ruled that, because Habba was appointed first assistant U.S. attorney amid a vacancy for U.S. attorney, she could not ascend to act in that position, as the law required an existing officer to take the job.
“Only the first assistant in place at the time of the vacancy automatically assumes acting status under the FVRA,” wrote the court, referencing the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.
The government objected to this reasoning.
“The panel’s interpretation of the FVRA would hobble Presidential transitions and has been routinely violated by the last four administrations without any court holding the practice unlawful. Rehearing en banc is warranted,” the government wrote.
The Third Circuit held that the Act did not permit Habba to act in the position.
Habba gained political prominence in 2023 and 2024 as a personal attorney to Trump during a civil trial against him in New York regarding fraud charges. After Trump took office for a second time in 2025, she was appointed “counselor to the president” and served in that role for three months.
U.S. attorneys are officers of the United States who are typically appointed by the president after nomination to the Senate, and with its advice and consent. They serve four-year terms. The case that led to Habba’s removal involves a prosecution where the defendant sued to dismiss his charges, asserting that Habba was unlawfully appointed.







