The recommended changes—posted in a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register officially dated Aug. 28—aim to establish a fixed visa period for nonimmigrant students, exchange visitors, and foreign media personnel to stay in the United States.
Current rules allow F (student) and J (educational and cultural exchange visitor) nonimmigrant visa holders to remain in the United States under a “duration of status (D/S)” or “duration of employment” model. According to the department, this model authorizes the visa holder to be present in the United States for an unspecified period of time, with no oversight or vetting.
“In turn, this has undermined DHS’s ability to effectively enforce compliance with the statutory inadmissibility grounds related to unlawful presence and has created incentives for fraud and abuse,” it reads.
The DHS stated that the fixed period being proposed for these visa holders and their spouses or dependents would be “until completion of their program or four years, whichever is shorter.” The F and J visa holders’ spouses would not be allowed to work, but their children could attend U.S. public schools.
The DHS also proposed changes for representatives of foreign media on I nonimmigrant visas. The draft recommended a fixed 240 days for these visa holders, with the option to extend for another 240 days through an extension-of-stay application with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
The changes will bring these visa classes in line with the rules for other types of nonimmigrant visas, which have specific departure dates, the DHS stated.
The proposal suggests giving F visa holders an additional 60 days from the law’s effective date to leave the United States, while J visa holders would be given 30 additional days from their program end date to depart the country. The department will also consider reducing the 60-day grace period for students to 30 days, aligning it with other visitor groups.
Those needing additional time to complete their studies or exchange programs can continue to file an extension-of-stay request.
If their extension-of-stay application is denied, visa holders and their dependents must immediately depart the United States.
Vulnerabilities for National Security
The draft document outlines instances of concern as examples of why the DHS is pursuing the changes, particularly in the F and J visa classes. The case studies highlight vulnerabilities to U.S. national security created by the open-ended nature of the “duration of status” visas.“Small numbers of scientists have committed serious violations of [National Institutes of Health] policies and systems by not disclosing foreign support (i.e., grants), laboratories, or funded faculty positions in other countries,” the report reads.
The DHS notice states that the proposals will address clear dangers to national security posed by foreign agents being granted F and J visas.
“A handful of those have been arrested for spying for China,” the DHS stated.
The changes would also address the risk posed by foreign nationals who are granted visas to study one degree but then transfer to a sensitive program, such as nuclear science, once they are on U.S. soil.
Aside from the security risks, such transfers have also burdened school administrators with the costs of processing the transfer requests of students who misrepresented their intentions to study at their institutions, according to the department.
Fraud and Abuse
The changes also crack down on misuse of F-1 student visas, as some students have abused the system by continuously enrolling in different programs at the same degree level, pursuing multiple master’s or undergraduate degrees or even degrees of a lower educational level.“In 2024, DHS identified nearly 77,000 F-1 students who have spent more than 10 years in student status,” the department stated.
Fraud has also been committed by school owners.
“Since 2008, multiple school owners and others have been criminally prosecuted for ‘pay-to-stay’ fraud, in which school officials, in return for cash payments, falsely report that F-1 students who do not attend school are maintaining their student status,” the DHS notice reads.
Some school owners even ran multiple educational businesses, between which they could transfer students as part of their fraud, it states.
Visas for students to attend language training education also came under scrutiny after the DHS “found students enrolling in lengthy periods of language training, in some cases for more than two decades.”
The draft proposes to offer a fixed period of entry of 24 months for language training education students to ensure that they are meeting the statutory requirements of their visas.
Fee to Amend, Extend Visas
The new rules also recommend changes to the process of applying for a visa extension, proposing that any changes be processed through the USCIS for a fee.The DHS said this recommendation is a result of its analysis of the economic impact of visa extensions as required by President Donald Trump’s executive orders 12866, 13563, and 14192, which require federal agencies to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of existing regulations and streamline their processes to be more effective.
This change would pass on $86.3 million to $88.1 million in annual costs to F, J, and I visa holders and their schools and sponsors.
Those applying for an extension would also be required to submit their biometrics, a change aimed at “enhancing the government’s oversight and monitoring of these aliens,” the DHS stated.
“DHS welcomes F academic students, J exchange visitors, and I representatives of foreign information media, but it also acknowledges that the sheer size of the population complicates oversight and vetting functions,” the notice reads.
Public Comments Sought
The public comment period for the DHS’s proposed rules, identified by Docket No. ICEB-2025-0001, is open until Sept. 27. Comments can be submitted by mail, fax, or the Federal eRulemaking Portal. All departments facing any changes to their reporting or record-keeping requirements via the proposed rule changes have 60 days to comment, as per the 1995 Paperwork Reduction Act. Their deadline is Oct. 27.“DHS encourages all interested parties to participate in this rulemaking by submitting data, views, comments, and arguments on all aspects of this notice of proposed rulemaking. Comments providing the most assistance to DHS will reference a specific portion of this rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include the data, information, or authority that supports the recommended change.”







