Developer Asks Supreme Court to Overturn Award for Covering Graffiti

Developer Asks Supreme Court to Overturn Award for Covering Graffiti
The graffiti mecca 5 Pointz is seen after being painted over by developers in the dead of night in the Long Island City neighborhood of the Queens borough of New York City on Nov. 19, 2013. Andrew Burton/Getty Images
Matthew Vadum
Updated:

A property owner in New York City petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court last week to overturn a $6.75 million damages award granted to graffiti artists after the owner whitewashed street-art paintings at an experimental site where works were routinely painted over to clear the way for new art.

The legal battle concerns the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA), which authorizes courts to impose damages of up to $150,000 against the owner of a work of visual art of “recognized stature” if the owner destroys it. VARA pits these statutory rights against the building owner’s rights, as well as the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, which states in part, “No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”