California Democratic Assemblywoman Maggy Krell from Sacramento was removed as author of her own bill on May 1 after she joined Republicans in a renewed attempt to strengthen penalties for buying 16- and 17-year-olds for sex.
Krell’s name as bill author was replaced by two of her Democratic colleagues, Assembly Public Safety Chair Nick Schultz from Burbank and Assemblywoman Stephanie Nguyen from Elk Grove.
“Minors of any age in the state of California that are contacted for a sexual purpose, that is punishable by a felony already,” said Schultz, a former deputy attorney general with the California Department of Justice (DOJ).
In response, Krell, who is also a former deputy attorney general for the California DOJ, said there is still a loophole in California law when it comes to this particular issue.
“The problem with [the law], which my colleague from Burbank referenced, is it includes a whole host of statutes for contacting a minor, but there’s one that’s missing: prostitution,” she said.
She said she didn’t care whether her name was on the bill, but she said she was concerned that the bill no longer treats 16- and 17-year-olds as victims.
“We need to say loud and clear that if you’re under 18, a child, a minor ... that the person who’s buying that person should be charged with a felony. It’s plain and simple,” she said.
The legislation advanced on April 29 after the provision was removed in a 7–0 vote in the public safety committee.
Democratic Assemblymembers Mia Bonta and LaShae Sharp-Collins abstained from the committee vote. They did not reply to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
“As we’ve heard today and outside of this chamber, there are Californians who are concerned about unintended consequences on young adults and LGBTQIA+ Californians, should it be a felony for 16- and 17-year-olds,” Schultz said before the vote.
The Epoch Times reached out to Schultz and Krell for comment.
Newsom Criticizes Removal of Provision
In response to the committee vote, California Gov. Gavin Newsom spoke out against members of his own party for removing the provision from the bill.“The law should treat all sex predators who solicit minors the same—as a felony, regardless of the intended victim’s age. Full stop,” the governor’s office said in an emailed statement to The Epoch Times on April 30.
Back then, amendments also excluded 16- and 17-year-olds, which Grove said was disappointing. This year, she co-authored AB 379 with Krell to fix this loophole, along with implementing penalties for loitering to purchase sex and funding survivor support.
Democratic committee leaders again removed the provisions that would have made purchasing older minors a felony.
“They did that to my bill last year,” Grove told The Epoch Times on May 1. “They excluded 16- and 17-year-olds from the felony provisions, treating them like adults, which is completely absurd.”
Republican Assemblyman Juan Alanis, vice chair of the public safety committee, who co-authored the sex trafficking bills both this year and last year, said he had “never been more angry and disturbed by actions taken on the Assembly Floor” on May 1.
“Purchasing or trafficking any minor of any age for sex should be a felony. Period,” he said in an emailed statement.
The public safety committee plans to schedule an informational hearing in the fall to discuss the felony provision, according to Schultz.