The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
Support Us
SHARE
USSocial Issues

Appeals Court Revives Case Challenging Connecticut Rule on Transgender Athletes

The plaintiffs said the CIAC policy discriminated against them by requiring them to compete against transgender athletes.
Copy
Facebook
X
Truth
Gettr
LinkedIn
Telegram
Email
Save
Appeals Court Revives Case Challenging Connecticut Rule on Transgender Athletes
The Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, which hears cases from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, stands in Lower Manhattan, New York City, on Jan. 18, 2019. Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Aldgra Fredly
By Aldgra Fredly
12/18/2023Updated: 12/18/2023
0:00

A federal appeals court on Friday revived a lawsuit filed by four female athletes challenging a Connecticut policy that allows transgender students born male to compete against girls in high school athletic events.

The full 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the case should return to the district court for review because the plaintiffs have standing in the litigation and have alleged injuries that may qualify for monetary relief.

“We do not consider whether plaintiffs’ Title IX claims have any merit or whether they would be entitled to the relief that they seek as a matter of equity, but rather whether the district court has jurisdiction to hear their claims in the first instance,” the judges said in a ruling on Dec. 15.

The plaintiffs—Selina Soule, Chelsea Mitchell, Alanna Smith, and Ashley Nicoletti—argued they were “deprived of honors and opportunities” to compete at higher levels because of a policy that allowed males who identify as female to compete against girls.

According to the court, all four plaintiffs had personally competed in Connecticut high school track and identified instances in which they raced against and finished behind one or both transgender athletes Andraya Yearwood and Terry Miller.

“For each plaintiff, the complaint identifies at least one race in which she allegedly competed against and lost to one or both intervenors [referring to the transgender athletes],” the ruling states.

Related Stories
Appeals Court Dismisses Connecticut Transgender Athlete Case
12/17/2022
Appeals Court Dismisses Connecticut Transgender Athlete Case
Women’s Rights Group Protests CIF’s Transgender Athlete Policy
9/16/2023
Women’s Rights Group Protests CIF’s Transgender Athlete Policy

The plaintiffs said the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Council (CIAC) policy discriminated against them by requiring them to compete against transgender athletes, who have a “physiological athletic advantage.”

The 2013 CIAC policy allows transgender students to compete in high school competitions designated for the gender they identify with.

However, the plaintiffs argued that the CIAC policy violated Title IX, a federal law designed to create equal opportunities for women in education and athletics.

“Plaintiffs allege—and we must assume—that but for intervenors’ [or transgender athletes’] participation in these specific races, they would have placed higher.

“For the purposes of the standing inquiry, we must also assume that plaintiffs are correct that allowing intervenors to compete in those races violated Title IX,” it added.

It concluded that the plaintiffs pleaded “a concrete, particularized, and actual injury in fact: the alleged denial of equal athletic opportunity and concomitant loss of publicly recognized titles and placements” during track competitions where they finished behind the transgender athletes.

Women protest as Pennsylvania transgender athlete Lia Thomas competes in the women's 200 freestyle final at the NCAA swimming and diving championships at Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Ga., on March 18, 2022. (John Bazemore/AP Photo)
Women protest as Pennsylvania transgender athlete Lia Thomas competes in the women's 200 freestyle final at the NCAA swimming and diving championships at Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Ga., on March 18, 2022. John Bazemore/AP Photo

Important Ruling for All Female Athletes

Conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represents the plaintiffs, praised the court’s decision as an important victory for female athletes across the country.

“Selina, Chelsea, Alanna, and Ashley—like all female athletes—deserve access to fair competition,” ADF Senior Counsel Roger Brooks said in a press release.

“The CIAC’s policy degraded each of their accomplishments and scarred their athletic records, irreparably harming each female athlete’s interest in accurate recognition of her athletic achievements,” he added.

A three-judge 2nd Circuit panel last year agreed with a federal judge that the plaintiffs had not shown they were deprived of opportunities because all of them regularly competed in state track championships and won some of them.

The full court said it would reconsider the case in February.

Title IX made it illegal for federally supported educational institutions to discriminate against students and workers based on sex. Its enactment in 1972, in its original form, led to more girls finishing high school and college and boosted the number of female athletes in high school and college sports and athletics.

The protection extended to transgender students once the definition of “sex” was expanded under the Biden administration to include the fuzzier political concept of gender identity.

Caden Pearson and Reuters contributed to this report.
Aldgra Fredly
Aldgra Fredly
Author
Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.
Author’s Selected Articles

US Indicts Russian National Over Alleged Role in Qakbot Ransomware Attacks

May 23, 2025
US Indicts Russian National Over Alleged Role in Qakbot Ransomware Attacks

HHS Investigation Finds Columbia University Violated Civil Rights of Jewish Students

May 23, 2025
HHS Investigation Finds Columbia University Violated Civil Rights of Jewish Students

US and China Resume Trade Talks After Geneva Meeting

May 23, 2025
US and China Resume Trade Talks After Geneva Meeting

DOJ Accuses NJ Rep. LaMonica McIver of Assaulting Federal Agents Outside ICE Facility

May 21, 2025
DOJ Accuses NJ Rep. LaMonica McIver of Assaulting Federal Agents Outside ICE Facility
Related Topics
Connecticut
transgender athletes
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2025 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.