This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
Courts

Appeals Court Allows Planned Parenthood Funding Block

Several states had argued that the funding ban was unconstitutional.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Appeals Court Allows Planned Parenthood Funding Block
Planned Parenthood signage is displayed outside of a health care clinic in Los Angeles, Calif., on May 16, 2023. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images
Matthew Vadum
Matthew Vadum
12/30/2025|Updated: 12/31/2025
0:00

A federal appeals court on Dec. 30 allowed the Trump administration to withhold Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood clinics in the 22 states that sued over a congressionally-approved funding block.

Section 71113 in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a federal law signed by President Donald Trump in July, imposes a one-year ban on Medicaid payments to health care nonprofits, but does not mention Planned Parenthood by name. Medicaid is a joint federal-state program that offers health insurance coverage to low-income Americans.

The defunding provision in the statute cuts off Medicaid payments to health care nonprofits that provide abortions and took in more than $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in fiscal year 2023. Planned Parenthood clinics provide services other than abortions—such as birth control and pregnancy testing—to Medicaid recipients.

An earlier version of the legislation set the defunding period at 10 years, but days before the bill received final congressional approval, the duration of the Medicaid reimbursement ban was reduced to one year.

Republicans have long tried to cut off federal funding for Planned Parenthood, arguing that taxpayer dollars should not flow to any organization involved in providing abortions.

Planned Parenthood has said the law unfairly singles it out for funding cuts and has led to at least 20 of its health centers closing their doors since the law was signed.

California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and other states sued, arguing the provision unfairly targets Planned Parenthood and was unconstitutional.

On Dec. 2, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of Section 71113 in the 22 states.

The states demonstrated a “substantial likelihood of success on their claim that Section 71113 fails to provide clear notice [to states participating in the Medicaid program] as required by the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution,” the judge wrote at the time.

In other words, Talwani found that the states were likely to succeed in establishing that the provision imposes an unconstitutional retroactive condition on their participation in Medicaid.

On Dec. 30, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit paused Talwani’s order.

The panel held that the federal government has “made a strong showing” that it will likely succeed in demonstrating that Section 71113 does not violate the spending clause, and that the government is “likely to prevail on the merits.”

On Dec. 12, the First Circuit overturned a Talwani ruling in another case filed by Planned Parenthood in which the organization claimed the law ran afoul of the Constitution. Talwani had ruled that the law unconstitutionally punished the group for providing abortions.

A spokesperson for California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the Dec. 30 ruling was disappointing, but that Bonta remains committed to “ensuring vulnerable Californians can access the health care they need.”

The Epoch Times reached out to the U.S. Department of Justice for comment. No reply was received by publication time.

Reuters contributed to this report.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Matthew Vadum
Matthew Vadum
Author
Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.
Author’s Selected Articles
Appeals Court Sides With Intelligence Officers Fired Over DEI Activities
Jul 02, 2026
Appeals Court Sides With Intelligence Officers Fired Over DEI Activities
Supreme Court Declines Trump’s Request to Fire Copyright Office Chief
Jul 02, 2026
Supreme Court Declines Trump’s Request to Fire Copyright Office Chief
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Apple’s Appeal of Contempt Finding in Epic Games Lawsuit
Jul 02, 2026
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Apple’s Appeal of Contempt Finding in Epic Games Lawsuit
Key Takeaways from Supreme Court’s Decision on Birthright Citizenship 
Jun 30, 2026
Key Takeaways from Supreme Court’s Decision on Birthright Citizenship 
AD
Add to My List
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.