Amazon Warehouse Project in Wawayanda Approved With $80 Million Tax Break

The Wawayanda Planning Board determined that the proposed building fit the criteria for exemption and approved it.
Amazon Warehouse Project in Wawayanda Approved With $80 Million Tax Break
Site of future Amazon warehouse at 22 McBride Road in the town of Wawayanda, N.Y., on Oct. 24, 2025. Oliver Mantyk/The Epoch Times
|Updated:
0:00
WAWAYANDA, N.Y.—An Amazon warehouse proposal that was denied in June was approved in the town of Wawayanda, shortly after an $80 million tax break was green-lit for the warehouse.
The Wawayanda Planning Board approved a height exemption for a 3.2 million-square-foot Amazon warehouse on Oct. 22. The warehouse proposal had been denied on June 11 because it exceeded the 65-foot area height restriction. The warehouse will be 96 feet tall.

Scannell Properties, the real estate developer responsible for building the warehouse, reapplied to the Wawayanda Planning Board in August. The developer cited a town law exempting buildings from the height restriction if they have sufficient fire-negating measures and larger-than-required property buffers.

The board determined that the proposed building fit the criteria for exemption and approved it.

Slate Hill Fire Department Chief Shaun Graham testified at the public hearing on Sept. 10 and submitted a letter on Sept. 18.

Graham gave a positive review of the warehouse’s firefighting measures and said he believed that the height exception would not inhibit the local fire department’s firefighting abilities.

State-of-the-art fire suppression systems, external fire-protected stairways and roof access, and Graham’s testimony were satisfactory for the board.

The warehouse will have large buffer zones. A “buffer” as defined by Wawayanda in the “Town of Wawayanda Planning Board Special Use Permits Findings for Project Bluebird” report, published to the town website, is an area near a structure that is “either consisting of naturally existing vegetation or created by the use of trees, shrubs, fences and/or berms, designed to continuously limit the view of, and/or sound from, the site to adjacent sites or properties.”

The town set the minimum buffer at 15 to 50 yards, depending on the side, and the buffers provided by Scanell’s proposed plan range from 213 to 1,013 yards.

The board concluded that these major buffers, along with the fact that the building will be constructed in a mining pit 30 to 40 feet below nearby I-84, will lessen the visual and audio effects of the warehouse.

The 108.4-acre property on which the warehouse will be built is currently a mine and part of a mixed commercial zoning district. Construction of the building is expected to employ 300 people, and the warehouse is projected to facilitate 750 permanent jobs.

Some of the benefits the board’s report cited were that Amazon will invest $15 million in local road and energy infrastructure, design and build an ambulance facility in Wawayanda, and support local schools.

The Amazon warehouse project by Scannell has remained unpopular with some residents. Many people came forward at public hearings to air their grievances against a future Amazon warehouse in their community.

On Oct. 23, the planning board published a letter clarifying some specifics about the warehouse and the board.

“The Planning Board is bound by law, not public opinion,“ the letter reads. ”The property is zoned for industrial use, and this project fits within the zoning. The Planning Board cannot lawfully deny a project simply because some residents dislike it. Doing so would expose the town to serious legal consequences.”

On Oct. 23, the Orange County Industrial Development Agency voted to give the project a 15-year payment-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT). The tax break program means Amazon will be paying about $80 million less in taxes over the next 15 years.

PILOTs exempt businesses and projects from a certain amount of property tax as a means of incentivizing growth and investment.

Democratic State Senator James Skoufis opposed the action in an Oct. 24 letter, saying that the PILOT violated the agency’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy and should be vetoed.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google