U.S. Can Help Egypt Democracy
The overthrow of the democratically elected government of Mohamed Morsy by the Egyptian military is not the end of a critical period in that country. It is only a transition period that needs special attention so as not to end as an even bloodier conflict than what it has been so far. The United States, more than any other country, can help Egypt overcome the dire straits it is in now.
At present, U.S. military aid to Egypt amounts to $1.3 billion in annual aid to the Egyptian military, which is about 20% of its funding. Egypt is currently the third-largest recipient of U.S. military aid, after Afghanistan and Israel. Between 1948 and 2012, the U.S. provided Egypt with a total of $72.9 billion in bilateral (government-to-government) aid. Since 1979, Egypt has been the second-largest recipient, after Israel, of U.S. bilateral foreign assistance.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on the State Department and Foreign Operations, stated that aid to the Egyptian military should be cut off because of the military takeover. In that regard, U.S. federal law states that non-humanitarian aid must be cut off to “the government of any country whose duly elected head of government is deposed by military coup d’etat or decree or, after the date of enactment of this Act, a coup d’etat or decree in which the military plays a decisive role.”
Some Egyptian military officials have stated that the military’s actions do not constitute a coup d’etat, since the military didn’t intend to have an enduring role in Egypt’s politics.
However, experience shows that on very few occasions the military—any military, anywhere—relinquishes power voluntarily.
Article Continues after the discussion. Vote and comment
[tok id=a04bef69a508ed0b581a813ad783d637 partner=1966]
Morsy made some serious mistakes during his tenure as president. He refused to include a wide array of opposition figures in government and was unable to redress the economy, which had been badly battered as a result of the prolonged upheaval to depose Hosni Mubarak, who had ruled the country for almost 30 years. And it is probably the economic woes that acted as a trigger for the popular demonstrations against Morsy’s rule.
Egypt is now going through a process called “stagflation,” a combination of inflation and very slow growth. During 2011, real GDP grew by 1.78% and increased to only 2.2% in 2012, a figure that slightly exceeds the country’s population growth. At the same time, the cost of living will probably increase substantially in 2013, a situation that may provoke additional unrest.
For the United States, there should be two priorities in dealing with that country’s present situation: to help ensure the return to a democratic government, and to help alleviate the country’s considerable economic problems. The naming of a transitional civilian government is a right step towards that first goal. As Edward Derejian, a former State Department, official told CNN, “This situation creates the possibility for a political transition in Egypt to a pluralistic government system.”
Inflation is now 7% overall and the country’s foreign exchange reserves went down from $36 billion in 2011 to $13.6 billion in February 2013. President Obama could name a group of experts to help Egyptian economists design a pro-growth economic package—including a public works component—to help that country come out of the morass it is now in.
At the same time, the United States could allow wheat exports to support a subsidized bread program to keep bread prices low and help finance grain storage facilities. It could also facilitate “debt swaps” so that money intended to pay for that country’s foreign debt could instead be used on training and infrastructure projects. To help Egypt now is to contribute in avoiding new popular revolts of dire consequences in the immediate future.
Dr. César Chelala is a co-winner of an Overseas Press Club of America award.
"Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times."