Trump Becomes First President to Attend ‘March for Life’ Pro-Life Rally

By Petr Svab
Petr Svab
Petr Svab
Petr Svab is a reporter covering New York. Previously, he covered national topics including politics, economy, education, and law enforcement.
January 24, 2020Updated: January 26, 2020

WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump made a speech at the March for Life pro-life rally in Washington on Jan. 24. He was the first president to attend the annual rally.

The 13-minute speech focused on Trump’s support for the pro-life movement and the religious community more broadly. He also highlighted his administration’s actions in this regard, including cutting some federal funding to abortion providers.

“When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God’s creation,” Trump said.

March for Life has been held annually since 1974, first held on the one-year anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a Supreme Court decision that prevented states from imposing most of the previously existing restrictions on abortion. One of the goals of the rally has been to have the decision overturned.

Presidents Ronald Reagan, in 1987, and George W. Bush, in 2008, addressed the rally over the phone. Trump delivered a speech over satellite from the White House’s Rose Garden in 2018 and sent attendees a video message in 2019. This time, however, was the first time a president spoke in person.

“Unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House,” Trump said.

Epoch Times Photo
Pro-life advocates march toward the U.S. Supreme Court building in the 47th annual March for Life in Washington on Jan. 24, 2020. (Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images)

Among the measures Trump took against abortion was reinstating the Mexico City policy, which blocks foreign aid to nongovernmental organizations that perform or promote abortion as a form of family planning. The policy was first put in place by Reagan but was nixed by Democratic presidents before being reinstated by Republican ones.

Trump has also had the Department of Health and Human Services reinterpret the rules for Title X so that it “prohibits the use of Title X funds to perform, promote, refer for, or support abortion as a method of family planning” and requires “clear financial and physical separation between Title X and non-Title X activities.”

As a result, Planned Parenthood, the country’s largest abortion provider, stated it will no longer draw Title X funds, forgoing an estimated $60 million in annual taxpayer funding.

“We look forward to all of the blessings that will come from the beauty, talent, purpose, nobility, and grace of every American child,” Trump said in the last sentences addressing the crowd of tens of thousands on Capitol Hill.

Epoch Times Photo
Pro-life advocates march in the 47th annual March for Life in Washington on Jan. 24, 2020. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)


Katie Garcia, a college freshman, traveled to the rally from New Orleans.

“There’s nothing about abortion that’s ethical,” she said, adding that she was only fully convinced to oppose abortion after attending the rally last year, especially after seeing images of aborted fetuses.

Epoch Times Photo
Katie Garcia attends the 47th annual “March for Life” in Washington on Jan. 24, 2020. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

She said that many people came to the rally in support of Trump’s reelection, but said she and others she traveled with didn’t come for that purpose.

“If that’s what brings people out here today, more power to them. That brings more people to raise awareness,” she said.

Jessy Suverino, a graduate student, came to the rally because of his belief “that the unborn deserve to have an opportunity to one day be born.”

“I’ve always believed that everybody deserves to be able to live,” he said.

“We here to protect the defenseless,” said Keiley Falcon, a middle-schooler.

Epoch Times Photo
Jessy Suverino (L) and Keiley Falcon attend the 47th annual “March for Life” in Washington on Jan. 24, 2020. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

John Rocha, 48, a teacher from Arkansas, said he attended the rally to “celebrate life.” He said it was the birth of his first child that convinced him to oppose abortion.

As for Trump’s speech, he said, “it’s great that a president, no matter who it is, what party, that he’s pro-life, that he would come out and support the whole movement.”

Epoch Times Photo
John Rocha attends the 47th annual “March for Life” in Washington on Jan. 24, 2020. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

Kevin McCullouch, 22, is a seminarian at the Pontifical College Josephinum in Columbus, Ohio.

“I’m just here to support my belief that abortion should be illegal,” he said, noting that he’s Catholic and believes life begins at conception.

He called Trump’s attendance “super awesome” and “a good move for reelection.”

“It shows his care for this community, and it shows his dedication,” he said.

Epoch Times Photo
Kevin McCullouch attends the 47th annual “March for Life” in Washington on Jan. 24, 2020. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

Abortion in the U.S.

Over 860,000 abortions were performed in the United States in 2017, according to the left-leaning Guttmacher Institute. About one in nine occurred in the second trimester or later.

The data is mostly based on a voluntary survey of abortion providers known to the institute. Some numbers were also collected from state databases or estimated.

Roe v. Wade and several subsequent cases stipulated that states can’t place restrictions on abortions conducted before a baby is considered “viable,” meaning the baby can survive outside the womb with medical support. Even after the baby is viable, a physician may perform an abortion to avoid risk to the mother’s life or health, including mental health. Many states have de facto defied the decision, establishing more strict criteria. Some states have passed so-called “heartbeat bills” in recent years that prohibit abortions if a heartbeat can be detected, which is around the sixth week.

At least some of the bills appear to be designed to draw court challenges, and have the Supreme Court pick up the issue.

A recent Marist poll (pdf) showed that 79 percent of Americans wanted restrictions on abortion beyond the framework allowed under Roe v. Wade—26 percent wanted it banned except for cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother, 24 percent wanted it banned beyond the first trimester, 11 percent supported a ban except to save the life of the mother, 9 percent supported a ban beyond the second trimester, and another 9 percent supported an outright ban.

In addition, 65 percent of Americans said they were “likely to vote for a [presidential] candidate who wants significant restrictions” on abortion, including 44 percent of Democrats.

The poll was conducted in partnership with The Knights of Columbus, a global Catholic fraternal service organization.

A 2018 Gallup poll showed that 60 percent of Americans think abortion “should generally be legal” in the first trimester, while 28 percent said the same for the second trimester. When it comes to abortion elected “for any reason,” 45 percent said it should be legal in the first trimester.

Cynthia Cai contributed to this report.