Trump Arrives at Manhattan Courthouse Ahead of Arraignment

Trump Arrives at Manhattan Courthouse Ahead of Arraignment
Former US President Donald Trump waves as he arrives at the Manhattan Criminal Court in New York on April 4, 2023. (Kena Betancur/Getty Images)
Joseph Lord
4/4/2023
Updated:
4/4/2023
0:00

President Donald Trump has arrived at the Manhattan courthouse ahead of his scheduled arraignment when charges will be announced against him for the first time.

Trump has surrendered himself to the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg where he is now under arrest until the arraignment hearing. At the office, Trump will undergo standard processing where he is expected to be fingerprinted and read his Miranda Rights. It is unclear if the former president will have to get his mug shot taken. Trump’s attorney Joe Tacopina has said that the former president won’t be handcuffed during the process.

The former president, in a Truth Social post en route to the courthouse, wrote: “Seems so SURREAL — WOW, they are going to ARREST ME. Can’t believe this is happening in America. MAGA!”

The arraignment is scheduled at the New York County Supreme Court at 2:15 p.m. Judge Juan Merchan will preside over Trump’s arraignment.

Trump is facing charges related to an investigation into a hush money payment made to porn actress Stormy Daniels in 2016. Daniels claims that Trump had an affair with her, but Trump has denied this. The payment was carried out by attorney Michael Cohen, a former Trump ally who has turned against the former president.

The arraignment marks the first proceeding of the criminal prosecution of a former president, something unprecedented in American history. It came days after a New York grand jury voted to indict Trump on March 30.

The Charges

While the indictment remains sealed, legal experts anticipate that Trump would be charged with felony-level falsifying business records. This charge would require Bragg to prove that Trump intended to falsify business records in an attempt to commit or cover up another crime—in this case, federal campaign finance violations.

It is believed that the case heavily relies on the testimony of former Trump attorney Michael Cohen. Weeks before the 2016 presidential election, Cohen paid $130,000 in hush money to Daniels to prevent her from going public about an alleged affair she had with Trump a decade earlier. Trump denies the affair.

NYPD police officers outside the New York County Supreme Court ahead of former President Donald Trump's arraignment on April 4, 2023. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)
NYPD police officers outside the New York County Supreme Court ahead of former President Donald Trump's arraignment on April 4, 2023. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

Cohen pleaded guilty to violating federal campaign finance laws in 2018 by arranging payments to Daniels and another woman who claimed to have had an affair with Trump. In his plea agreement, Cohen claimed to have done so at Trump’s direction and that he was reimbursed by the Trump Organization through routine legal expenses, despite his earlier claims to the contrary.

Trump has denied any wrongdoing in the matter, denouncing the case as “political persecution.”

Possible Gag Order

It has been speculated that Bragg may request the judge issue a gag order to prevent Trump from discussing the case publicly, a move that Republicans were quick to denounce as “unconstitutional.”

If the judge agrees to Bragg’s request, it could mean that Trump or his lawyers could be found in contempt of court if they try to discuss the case publicly.

In an April 4 press release, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) expressed significant concerns over reports that Bragg may seek a gag order against Trump.

Media personnel outside the New York County Supreme Court ahead of former President Donald Trump's arraignment on April 4, 2023. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)
Media personnel outside the New York County Supreme Court ahead of former President Donald Trump's arraignment on April 4, 2023. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)
“To put any restrictions on the ability of President Trump to discuss his mistreatment at the hands of this politically motivated prosecutor would only further demonstrate the weaponization of the New York justice system,” the duo wrote. “To even contemplate stifling the speech of the former commander in chief and current candidate for President is at odds with everything America stands for.”

Protests

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a longtime Trump ally, appeared before the courthouse the same morning at a rally in support of the former president, where she blasted Bragg’s investigation.

“Every American should take a stand,” she added. “This is what happens in communist countries, not the United States of America. We have to take a stand against the injustice, the corruption, and the communist Democrats who are taking our legal code and twisting it, manipulating it, and converting it into something it was never meant to be.”

Greene’s comments came amid competing protests over the indictment.

Protesters outside the New York County Supreme Court ahead of former President Donald Trump's arraignment on April 4, 2023. (The Epoch Times)
Protesters outside the New York County Supreme Court ahead of former President Donald Trump's arraignment on April 4, 2023. (The Epoch Times)

Republicans and other pro-Trump voices took to the streets to denounce the planned charges, while counter-protestors mounted a rally in support of Bragg’s move.

Organized by the New York Young Republicans Club, the pro-Trump protest was met with pushback from counter-protesters who were there to express their distaste for the former president.

Displaying banners with such statements as “Trump Lies All the Time” and “Trump 4 Prison,” the anti-Trump protesters jeered, whistled, and shouted obscenities during Greene’s remarks in an attempt to drown her out.

Trump is expected to speak to reporters briefly outside the courtroom before a scheduled speech later tonight at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida.

Further protests are expected following Trump’s arraignment.

During an April 4 appearance on NTD, the sister media outlet of The Epoch Times, former White House aide Peter Navarro called the criminal proceedings “a crossing the Rubicon kind of event” for Democrats. He expressed concerns that protests following the arraignment could turn violent due to infiltration by agent provocateurs and encouraged protesters to keep things peaceful and make records of anyone endorsing or pushing for violence.

Gary Bai and Samantha Flom contributed to this report.