OK people, we need to discuss billboards. Yes, we really must.
At best, these giant corporate placards are problematic—they loom garishly over us, clutter our landscapes, and intrude into our communities with no respect for local aesthetics or preferences. Now, however, billboards are getting a high-tech reboot, allowing advertisers to invade not only our places but also our privacy.
Having to see billboards everywhere is bad enough. Far worse, though, is that the modernized, digitalized, computerized structures can see you—and track you.
Clear Channel Outdoor Americas, having already splattered the country with tens of thousands of billboards, has revealed that it’s partnering with AT&T and other data snoops to erect “smart” billboards that will know and record when you drive or walk past one.
Using your own mobile phone, they can then follow your travel patterns and consumer behavior. Aggregating that information with other available data, Clear Channel can then know the average age and gender of passersby who see an ad on a particular billboard and know whether they later make purchases.
It’s “a bit creepy,” admits Andy Stevens, Clear Channel’s own vice president for “research and insights.”
Stevens rationalizes the company’s zippy new Orwellian billboards as just another step into the digital future: “We’re just tapping into an existing data ecosystem,” he shrugs. The millions of profiles collected by Clear Channel are “obviously … very valuable to an advertiser.”
Yet maybe they’re more valuable to those of us who treasure our privacy and have given no permission to be targeted and tracked by a billboard huckster. And we thought government spying was out of control.
For information on corporate snooping, go to EPIC.org.
Jim Hightower is a columnist for OtherWords, radio commentator, writer, and public speaker. He’s also editor of the newsletter, The Hightower Lowdown, and a member of the Public Citizen board. This article was originally published on OtherWords.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.