This spring, Missouri lawmakers passed an eight-week ban on abortion by a significant margin. In May, Gov. Mike Parson signed it into law.
Already, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is attempting to reverse the ban via a referendum.
The ACLU has had to go to great lengths, including making an appeal to a federal court and taking a literal interpretation of the referendum process. The organization’s efforts, while legal, demonstrate just how powerful it remains and how it disregards Missourians’ choices—to say nothing of the rights of the unborn.
Per state law, the organization had to receive permission from Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft to go forward with the first stage of their referendum. The ACLU sent the referendum petition sample sheet to him to be approved, which he rejected on constitutional grounds, because the abortion law has an emergency provision in it. Missouri law states that if the law is addressing an emergency, there can’t be a referendum about it.
What’s the emergency? Missouri’s Republican-led legislature cares about mothers and unborn babies; thus, they specifically revised the bill to include a provision that would require both parents of a minor to consent to abortions in most cases. The Republican lawmakers classified this section as an emergency clause “because of the need to protect the health and safety of women and their children, both unborn and born.” Because it was classified as such, this particular section took effect as soon the governor signed it.
Let me be clear: It’s perfectly legal to instigate a referendum as a means of changing the law. It is, in fact, in the state constitution to protect “the people” from being subjected to laws they believe are unfair or unjust. However, save for the fact that one prominent Republican donor has voiced his desire for a rape and incest exception to be included in the law, I see no other evidence that Missouri’s abortion law falls under the category of unfair or unjust. Even the latter complaint is hardly enough for a statewide vote. That’s something that should have been lobbied to Republican lawmakers beforehand (and perhaps it was).
Ironically, when it comes to usurping the will of Missourians, the ACLU seems to be more misguided than ever. Republican lawmakers in Missouri didn’t craft this bill lightly, nor did they do it to create controversy. To their credit, when they worked to pass the law, they approached it with a specific strategy.
Not only did Republican lawmakers take great care in drafting this bill before it became law, but it reflects the constituents in Missouri. Yet, the ACLU, in all its entitled charade of pro-choice legal prowess, believes it alone is correct: The voice of the people who voted for the lawmakers who passed the abortion ban don’t matter—only the ACLU’s opinion does.
The ACLU’s efforts to overturn this ban seem to have happened with a significant amount legal maneuvering, luck—thanks to Democrat judges—and an unprecedented disdain for the rights of the people in Missouri—including the unborn.
Friends Read Free