Disney, Comcast, Warner Bros., IBM Halt Ads on X After Report Accuses Platform of Promoting Nazism

X intends to file a lawsuit against the organization behind the report for the ‘fraudulent attack on our company,’ Musk said.
Disney, Comcast, Warner Bros., IBM Halt Ads on X After Report Accuses Platform of Promoting Nazism
Elon Musk in Paris on June 16, 2023. (Joel Sagat/AFP via Getty Images)
Naveen Athrappully
11/18/2023
Updated:
11/19/2023
0:00

Big global brands are pulling advertising from X, formerly known as Twitter, after a media report charged the platform with promoting pro-Nazi content, an accusation that X has rebutted.

IBM, Comcast/NBCUniversal, Lions Gate Entertainment, Paramount, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Disney confirmed to various media outlets that they were pausing ads on X. At a news briefing on Nov. 17, Johannes Bahrke, a spokesperson for the European Commission, stated that the group is freezing advertisements on X after it saw “an alarming increase in disinformation and hate speech on several social media platforms in recent weeks, and X is certainly quite effective of that.”

The ad pullout follows the release of a report by left-wing media watchdog Media Matters for America that claimed that X was placing advertisements of Apple, Bravo (NBCUniversal), Oracle, Xfinity (Comcast), and IBM “next to posts that tout Hitler and his Nazi Party.”

Corporate ads were appearing on “pro-Hitler, Holocaust denial, white nationalist, pro-violence, and neo-Nazi accounts,” according to the report, which included screenshots of such ad placements.

Media Matters has published a list of companies that have pulled out advertisements from X following its report.

Elon Musk, the owner of X, slammed Media Matters for its report.

“The split second court opens on Monday; X Corp. will be filing a thermonuclear lawsuit against Media Matters and ALL those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company,” he said in a Nov. 18 X post.

In a company statement, X said that the Media Matters report “completely misrepresented” the real experience of users on the platform and called it “another attempt to undermine freedom of speech and mislead advertisers.”

An executive at X told The Epoch Times that the platform “did a sweep on the accounts that Media Matters found, and they will no longer be monetizable.” In addition, the specific posts will also be labeled as “Sensitive Media.”

The executive clarified that the X system isn’t “intentionally placing a brand actively next to this type of content, nor is a brand actively trying to support this type of content with an ad placement.” Instead, “ads follow the people on X. In this case, the Media Matters researcher has its own user handle, and they are then actively looking for this content—that’s how user targeting works.”

“Groups like Media Matters aggressively search for posts on X and then go to the accounts, and if they see an ad, Media Matter researchers keep hitting refresh to capture as many brands as possible.”

The executive asked for three pieces of information from Media Matters—the user handle, the date, and the time when the organization took the screenshots.

Restricting Free Speech on X

X said in its statement that the platform “works to protect the public’s right to free speech.” However, for speech to be “truly free,” there must be freedom to see or hear things that some people may find objectionable. X stated that “everyone has the right to make up their own minds about what to read, watch, or listen to.”

Despite that “clear and consistent position,” X has been attacked by several legacy media outlets and activist groups such as Media Matters, which seek to “undermine freedom of expression on [X] because they perceive it as a threat to their ideological narrative and those of their financial supporters.”

Such groups are trying to use their influence to attack X’s revenue streams by “deceiving advertisers,” the statement said.

X said that Media Matters “created an alternate account” and curated the content appearing on the account’s timeline. They then “repeatedly refreshed” the account timelines to find “rare instances of ads serving next to the content they chose to follow.”

“Our logs indicate that they forced a scenario resulting in 13 times the number of ads served compared to the median ads served to an X user.”

One of the brands whose ads were allegedly shown next to a pro-Nazi post per the Media Matters report had very low exposure, X said. The platform pointed out that this brand’s ads were shown adjacent to the post only two times and that only two people, one of whom is the author of the Media Matters report, had been exposed to this.

Speaking to The Epoch Times, the X executive said that the platform has implemented “stronger brand safety and suitability” controls than other networks and that these are capabilities that never existed in Twitter’s 17 years.

“So far this year, 99 percent of measured ad placements have appeared adjacent to content scoring above the brand safety ‘floor’ criteria set by [the Global Alliance for Responsible Media], per third-party data,” the executive stated.

Musk and Anti-Semitic Charge

The exodus of big brands from X comes as Mr. Musk is also attracting criticism regarding anti-Semitism. In a comment, Mr. Musk agreed with a controversial post that accused Jewish communities of pushing “dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.”

Mr. Musk later clarified that “this does not extend to all Jewish communities” and placed blame on groups such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a Jewish advocacy group.

“[The ADL] unjustly attacks the majority of the West, despite the majority of the West supporting the Jewish people and Israel,“ Mr. Musk said. ”This is because they cannot, by their own tenets, criticize the minority groups who are their primary threat. It is not right and needs to stop.”

Responding to Mr. Musk’s comments on the controversial post, Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL, said in a Nov. 16 X post, “At a time when anti-Semitism is exploding in America and surging around the world, it is indisputably dangerous to use one’s influence to validate and promote anti-Semitic theories.”

The White House also condemned Mr. Musk’s comments.

“It is unacceptable to repeat the hideous lie behind the most fatal act of anti-Semitism in American history at any time, let alone one month after the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust,” White House spokesperson Andrew Bates said, according to Axios.

Linda Yaccarino, the CEO of X, said in a Nov. 17 X post that the platform’s point of view “has always been very clear that discrimination by everyone should STOP across the board—I think that’s something we can and should all agree on.”

“When it comes to this platform—X has also been extremely clear about our efforts to combat anti-Semitism and discrimination. There’s no place for it anywhere in the world—it’s ugly and wrong. Full stop.”

Speaking to Variety, a Lionsgate spokesperson cited Mr. Musk’s “recent anti-Semitic tweet” as a reason for suspending advertisements on the platform.
Meanwhile, Mr. Musk said in a Nov. 18 post, “Many of the largest advertisers are the greatest oppressors of your right to free speech.”