San Pedro Port Largely Excluded From Biden’s Infrastructure Proposal

San Pedro Port Largely Excluded From Biden’s Infrastructure Proposal
Ships line the horizon seen from Seal Beach, Calif., as they await to come ashore to The Port of Los Angeles, on Jan. 12, 2021. (John Fredricks/The Epoch Times)
Tim Shaler
4/6/2021
Updated:
4/7/2021
Commentary

One out of 50 Americans derives their employment from the economic powerhouse at the combined ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

Even so, less than one percent of the infrastructure spending proposed last week by President Joe Biden would be spent on all “inland waterways, coastal ports, land ports of entry, and ferries,” according to an independent analysis done for The Epoch Times. The analysis is based on the White House’s “fact sheet,” published last week to accompany Biden’s so-called infrastructure proposal.

Of course, it hasn’t yet been disclosed how much of that spending would go toward improving coastal ports, as opposed to improving river waterways, border crossings, and ferries.

According to the fact sheet, $17 billion is proposed to be spent on the four modes of water and land ports, out of a proposed $2.3 trillion in spending.

The Port of Los Angeles’ website indicates nearly 3 million Americans nationwide derive their work from the economic impact created by the combined ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles.  The website refers to both ports together as the San Pedro Bay Port Complex.

Three million employed as a result of the San Pedro Bay Port Complex means one in 50 people nationwide are employed because of the facility, considering there are about 150 million employed in the U.S.

Before the current administration’s infrastructure proposal, the ports were already undergoing capital improvements of more than $2 billion.

Both the city of Long Beach and the city of Los Angeles operate their ports under separate city departments and lease out the berths and other facilities to lessees who operate the facilities.

According to the Port of Los Angeles website, “One in nine jobs across the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura is connected to the San Pedro Bay Port Complex, which includes the Port of Los Angeles and its neighboring Port of Long Beach (a separate entity and department of the City of Long Beach).”

It also states that “in California alone, nearly one million jobs are related to trade through the Port of Los Angeles.”

The containers that cargo ships carry are called 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs). In 2019, more than 30 percent of all TEUs traded into or from the U.S. went through the San Pedro Bay Port Complex.

The Port of Los Angeles handled 9.3 million TEUs, and the Port of Long Beach handled another 7.6 million TEUs—for a combined 16.9 million TEUs handled by the combined ports. That figure accounts for more than 30 percent of all the 55.5 million TEUs shipped into or from the U.S. in 2019.

Even though Southern California’s twin ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles generate 1 out of 50 of all jobs in the U.S., and one out of nine jobs across most of Southern California, and they handle more than 30 percent of all container-shipped cargo for the country, they can expect to get only some small fraction of 1 percent of the infrastructure spending being proposed.

Tim Shaler is a professional investor and economist based in Southern California. He is a regular columnist for The Epoch Times, where he exclusively provides some of his original economic analysis.
Tim Shaler is a professional investor and economist based in Southern California. He is a regular columnist for The Epoch Times, where he exclusively provides some of his original economic analysis.
Related Topics