Report: Daily News Columnist Shaun King Posts Documents Accusing Peyton Manning of Sexual Assault

By Dave Martin, Epoch Times
February 14, 2016 8:49 pm Last Updated: February 14, 2016 8:49 pm

Peyton Manning’s once-squeaky clean image may soon come crashing down.

Manning, the face of the NFL and the pitchman for Nationwide Insurance, DirecTV, and Papa John’s Pizza, was listed as a defendant—along with Archie Manning, John Underwood, and HarperCollins Publishers—in a 2003 court document entitled “Facts of the Case” that was posted online by New York Daily News Columnist Shaun King on Feb. 13, 2016.

Related Coverage
Report: Daily News Columnist Shaun King Posts Documents Accusing Peyton Manning of Sexual AssaultWatch: Peyton Manning Pokes Fun at Eli Manning’s Super Bowl Stare on ‘The Tonight Show’

The shocking, 74-page document is from a little-known, already-settled defamation suit against Manning by Dr. Jamie Naughright, who was the former Director of Health and Wellness for the Men’s Athletic Program at the University of Tennessee while Manning was a student there from 1994-98.

In it, Naughright alleges that Manning sexually assaulted her (by placing his naked butt and rectum on her head) while she was examining him for a possible stress fracture back on Feb. 29, 1996, tried to cover it up with a story that’s not supported by an eyewitness, and then attempted to smear her reputation in a book with claims against her that went unsupported.

The document also mentions a 1994 incident between Manning and Naughright—which Naughright and her lawyers claim is the “genesis” for Manning’s dislike of Naughright and is relevant to understanding the Feb. 29, 1996 incident—but Manning’s lawyers requested the exhibits and testimony relating to the 1994 incident be kept confidential. Thus the whole 1994 incident is under seal.

Former lawyer Mike Florio of ProFootballTalk makes sure to call the document, “a piece of advocacy.”

“The 74-page document is something that was written by the lawyers representing Jamie Ann Naughright in her defamation case against the Mannings. The 74-page document is, necessarily, one-sided,” wrote Florio.

“The 74-page document is not objective. The 74-page document is not supposed to be objective. The 74-page document is not a court order or any other decision made by a neutral party. And, ultimately, the 74-page document is incomplete without comparing it to the corresponding ‘Facts of the Case’ document submitted by the defendants in the case.”

Ultimately the most damaging parts of the document aren’t just the alleged 1996 sexual assault (and whatever event that happened in 1994 that Manning’s lawyers wanted sealed) but also a letter from the eyewitness of the alleged assault, former University of Tennessee athlete Malcolm Sexton.

In the letter to Manning, dated December 10, 2002, Sexton at one point says, “Peyton, you messed up. I still don’t know why you dropped your drawers.”

Sexton also goes on to say that he’s not on either Manning or Naughright’s side and has stuck to the story throughout and lost his eligibility for it, implying that his red-shirt request was never granted because of it.

Meanwhile the document also claims that Manning’s assertions that Naughright had a vulgar mouth were also unsubstantiated and that he did so to salvage his own reputation.