Oregon Supreme Court Temporarily Reinstates Governor’s Virus Restrictions

May 19, 2020 Updated: May 19, 2020

The Oregon Supreme Court temporarily reinstated Gov. Kate Brown’s COVID-19 restrictions, just hours after a county judge ruled that her statewide order was “null and void.”

Baker County Circuit Judge Matthew Shirtcliff ruled that Brown didn’t seek the state legislature’s approval to extend a stay-at-home order beyond its original 28-day limit in an attempt to curb the spread of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

The state Supreme Court ruled that Shirtcliff’s order is pending review by the high court justices. At the same time, the statewide pandemic restrictions were reinstated until the court can render a decision in the case, according to local news outlets.

Brown praised the Supreme Court decision on May 18.

“Following swift action by the Oregon Supreme Court, my emergency orders to protect the health and safety of Oregonians will remain in effect,” Brown wrote on Twitter, after the order was rendered by presiding Justice Thomas Balmer. “There are no shortcuts for us to return to life as it was before this pandemic. Moving too quickly could return Oregon to the early days of this crisis, when we braced ourselves for hospitals to be overfilled and ventilators in short supply.”

Epoch Times Photo
People line up to get their care kits containing many hard to find items including masks, sanitizing supplies, personal care items, and education materials at Lynn Technical High School in Lynn, Mass., on May 16, 2020. (Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images)

After Shirtcliff’s ruling, it was criticized by Brown and other top officials in her administration, with the governor saying she would immediately appeal it. The judge had responded to a lawsuit that was filed by a group of churches, who had argued that Brown’s order restricted their religious freedoms.

Shirtcliff had argued that the churches suffered “irreparable harm” for not being able to exercise their religious freedoms.

“The governor’s orders are not required for public safety when plaintiffs can continue to utilize social distancing and safety protocols at larger gatherings involving spiritual worship,” he ruled, according to Oregon Live, finding that churches are able to undertake necessary social distancing precautions that grocery stores and other essential businesses have implemented.

Ray Hacke, the attorney representing faith groups, said he wasn’t surprised by the Supreme Court’s move.

“The way I see it, the lower court found that the governor’s actions have irreparably harmed the religious people of this state,” Hacke told OPB. “Basically, she turned around and asked the Supreme Court: ‘They’ve already been irreparably harmed for the last three months, a couple more days won’t hurt.’”

Brown’s initial emergency declaration had lasted for 60 days, and earlier in May, she extended it for an additional 60 days. Shirtcliff found that the move was illegal, OPB reported.