Tim Hortons set Canadian social media ablaze on May 25 with a press release promising to hire locals over foreign workers. Behind the drama and hot takes is an important question: If our national coffee icon can do without foreign workers, why does any restaurant or retail employer need them?
Going even further, Tim Hortons declared that it will no longer lobby Ottawa for greater access to foreign workers, saying that “in 2026, with high youth unemployment nationally, lobbying for expanded access is no longer necessary.” This followed a blunt admission that it had lobbied for this very thing in the past, particularly in the period after the pandemic when there were “acute labour shortages across the country.”
This announcement by Tim Hortons comes less than two weeks after American chain Dunkin’ Donuts revealed on May 12 that it will be returning north of the border as soon as late 2026 to “open hundreds of Dunkin’ locations across Canada.” Is the Tim Hortons foreign worker U-turn an opening salvo in the coffee war now brewing up as Tim’s and Dunkin’ vie for the hearts, minds, and palates of the discerning Canadian coffee drinker?
While it is impossible to say for sure, we do know that Tim Hortons is aware that its status as an icon of Canadiana has been tarnished by its reliance on foreign labour, and is seeking to reverse this negative association.
In any case, Tim Hortons is now citing changing economic conditions—specifically “high youth unemployment”—as the reason it is reducing its hiring of foreign workers. It would logically follow that all businesses drawing from the same subset of lower-skill, lower-wage workers that Tim Hortons hires would also no longer need TFWs.
The 10,000 new local jobs promised by Tim Hortons would soak up only a small proportion of the nearly half a million young people in this country who looked unsuccessfully for a job last year—and this does not even include the unemployed in every other age demographic.
After the pandemic, “work restrictions for non-permanent residents, notably international students, were relaxed” to “satisfy surging demand for labour.” While this met the immediate desire for workers from employers, the long-term outcome was that “this deluge of available labour well outpaced demand, putting upward pressure on the youth unemployment rate.”
Other than Tim Hortons, no prominent businesses in Canada have drawn the conclusion that rising youth unemployment should translate into fewer foreign hires. And while Tim Hortons has promised to stop lobbying government on foreign worker policies, the most prominent business lobbies in the country are clearly not on the same page.
Prime Minister Carney has been open about advocacy from the business sector to ensure access to temporary foreign workers.
The principal duty of businesses is to make a profit; it makes sense that they will continue to use foreign labour if it is allowed and helps their bottom line. As the case of Tim Hortons shows, this is often more a desire than a need. As youth unemployment swells, there is no justification in continuing to grant this desire.







