The New Quantitative Easing: A Double-Edged Sword

Given that the U.S. economy is at full employment and stock markets are hovering around record levels, it may only be possible to stimulate economic activity at the margins.
The New Quantitative Easing: A Double-Edged Sword
U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as Jerome Powell, his nominee for the chairman of the Federal Reserve, takes to the podium during a press event at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 2, 2017. Drew Angerer/Getty Images
James Gorrie
Updated:
It looks like America’s wasteful spending habits have once again caught up with us. For the past few weeks, the Federal Reserve has had to provide liquidity in the nation’s money market. The banking system’s overnight cash loans or “repos” involving banks’ short term selling and repurchasing U.S. securities could not function by itself anymore.

A Short-Term Liquidity Crunch or is it Long Term?

The simplified explanation of the “repo liquidity crunch” is that banks with a surplus of cash and reserves prefer holding onto their savings rather than lend it to other banks for a very high interest rate, and against highly secure collateral. This cash-holding sentiment is driven in part by regulation and voluntary banking agreements that require large banks to have 30 days of cash on hand to weather liquidity storms and other potential crises.

This liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) is intended to strengthen banks’ ability to continue operations in the event of a liquidity crisis or other financial shocks. Large banks’ LCR is a helpful rule for obvious reasons, but it also has harmful consequences as well.

James Gorrie
James Gorrie
Author
James R. Gorrie is the author of “The China Crisis” (Wiley, 2013) and writes on his blog, TheBananaRepublican.com. He is based in Southern California.
twitter
Related Topics