The New IHR Changes Are Merely Cosmetic

The New IHR Changes Are Merely Cosmetic
Pedal to the Stock/Shutterstock
David Bell
Thi Thuy Van Dinh
Updated:
0:00
Commentary

For two years, the 196 State Parties to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR)—composed of 194 Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO), and Liechtenstein and the Vatican—have been submitting and discussing proposed amendments to update this agreement. Introduced in the 1960s, the IHR are intended to strengthen national capacities and improve coordination among countries in the event of a health emergency. Though a legally binding agreement under international law (i.e., a treaty), most of the provisions have always been voluntary.

David Bell, senior scholar at the Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), programme head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, Wash.
twitter