John Robson: Canada Sends Verbal Support Against Houthis, Does Nothing

John Robson: Canada Sends Verbal Support Against Houthis, Does Nothing
A Royal Air Force Typhoon FRG4s is being prepared to conduct further strikes against Houthi military targets in Yemen at RAF Akrotiri, in Akrotiri, Cyprus, on Feb. 3, 2024. (Cpl Samantha Drummee/MoD Crown Copyright via Getty Images)
John Robson
2/5/2024
Updated:
2/5/2024
Commentary
With the generally benign Pax Americana of freedom of the seas, stable financial institutions, and deterrence of direct, large-scale attacks on open societies under increasing assault, it’s good to read headlines like “Latest wave of U.S., Britain strikes on Yemen’s Houthis had support of Canada.” Good here meaning “bad” because it’s false… and worse.
That CP story, following puzzling modern journalistic practice, cited something the Department of National Defence said without providing a link to what’s surely readily available online. However, I did track it down and it’s this: “Joint Statement from Australia, Bahrain, Denmark, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United States on Additional Strikes Against the Houthis in Yemen.” So we didn’t even unleash a barrage of press releases. We just fired off one manufactured elsewhere.

We certainly didn’t fire a barrage of munitions. We haven’t got one. That was Britain, whose rapidly crumbling military can still provide auxiliary actual support. All we sent, you discover in paragraph four of a story that starts misleadingly “Canada was among several allies that provided support to the United States and United Kingdom during their second wave of attacks against Houthi targets in Yemen, the Department of National Defence said Saturday,” is “two planners and one intelligence analyst.” Also known as window dressing.

Or not, which is where things get really troubling. Our government, here meaning the executive branch and much of the legislature, genuinely believes words are deeds and wishes are horses. We are no longer surprised to read that the prime minister promised a $50 million “Canada Financial Crimes Agency” in 2021 and nobody knows if anything happened including, apparently, him. Or that “Canada a ‘safe haven’ for ‘transnational crime networks and their dirty money’: U.S. report.” Words? Oh yeah. Deeds? No thanks.

What’s crucial here, other than the obvious threats to our national security from our navy having virtually no ships while our aging used submarines cannot be used, our army that fielded five divisions in World War II from under 12 million Canadians being unable today to send one regiment into combat and our air force going AWOL, is that we don’t care. We’re no longer surprised, let alone indignant.

No, wait. That’s important but not crucial. What’s crucial is that we live in a world of make-believe, emanating from politics perhaps but resonating with enough voters to survive until push comes to shove. And not just us; in the 2011 Libyan crisis, then-British Prime Minister David Cameron asked where their nearest aircraft carrier was only to be reminded he’d scrapped it in gutting defence to fund welfare, yet assumed it must still be operational because he wanted it.

While searching the DND site for that “support” statement, I was offered such management-consultant verbiage as “All news products” and “STRONG SECURE ENGAGED, Canada’s Defence Policy: Discover how the Defence Policy will shape Canada’s role in the world,” not to mention “Canadian Armed Forces concludes Summary Investigation into 2022 vehicle accident at Royal Military College”… in 2024. If that’s summary, how long would a real one take? But I digress.

The people who call us “Strong Secure Engaged,” while realistic about focus group findings, are completely deluded about our actual military situation. They think we are, well, strong, secure, engaged. And we are none of the above, except perhaps secure thanks to Uncle Sam, who will certainly patrol our Arctic if we don’t. Our “Defence Policy” will shape our role in the world by depriving us of one, except as protectorate or victim, because we have no armed forces.

The United States has its own problems, from intellectual to fiscal, slowly but relentlessly sapping their combat capability, including a bizarrely woke military that seems to have employed focus groups to find the exact approach best designed to discourage the dwindling pool of appropriate recruits from applying. But as Adam Smith said, there’s a lot of ruin in a nation.

Washington is still willing and able to defend world order, even as most of their allies insult and annoy them and incline the U.S. public to withdraw into Fortress America instead of wasting blood and treasure on ungrateful foreigners. Like us, who skip joint training exercises because we have nothing to send and nobody to operate it, are distrusted on intelligence and tout inclusion with Bahrain on joint statements as better than nothing, barely. Yet we strut strut strut and talk talk talk.

If we knew it, we would be crimson with shame. And we would try to do something. But we don’t. Instead we think posturing, pontificating, and preening actually are strength, compassion, and commitment.

The politicians aren’t faking it. What you see is what you get. And citizens assume that because we want to be safe, and think we’re safe, we must be safe.

It’s bad. Very bad.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
John Robson is a documentary filmmaker, National Post columnist, contributing editor to the Dorchester Review, and executive director of the Climate Discussion Nexus. His most recent documentary is “The Environment: A True Story.”
Related Topics