Viewpoints
Opinion

Iran, Washington, and the Magical Theater of Nuclear Weapons

Iran, Washington, and the Magical Theater of Nuclear Weapons
Centrifuge machines in the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in central Iran in a file photo released on Nov. 5, 2019. Atomic Energy Organization of Iran via AP
|Updated:
0:00

Iran already has nuclear weapons capability, and possibly operational nuclear warheads and delivery systems and protocols. So why do successive U.S. administrations keep insisting that the United States will not permit Iran to acquire “a nuclear weapon?”

Part of the reason lies in the belief that until the presence of nuclear weapons (in Iran or any other state) is demonstrated and acknowledged then it can be constrained by conveying deterrent power and prestige to the holder. The most potent aspects of nuclear weapons—in the 21st century is largely a show of military effectiveness rather than as counter-city weapons—are the prestige and deterrence capability conferred on holders.

Gregory Copley
Gregory Copley
Author
Gregory Copley is president of the Washington-based International Strategic Studies Association and editor-in-chief of the “Defense & Foreign Affairs” series of publications. Born in Australia, Copley is an entrepreneur, writer, government adviser, defense publication editor, and Member of the Order of Australia. His latest and 37th book is “The Noble State: Governance Options in an Ignoble Era.”
Related Topics