Viewpoints
Opinion

Hypersonic Overhype: Challenging the Strategic Necessity of High-Speed Arms

Hypersonic Overhype: Challenging the Strategic Necessity of High-Speed Arms
An artistic rendition of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2. The Chinese regime recently held its fourth test of a hypersonic missile. DARPA
|Updated:
0:00
Commentary
The United States has been exploring the research and development of hypersonic weapons technologies for decades. Historically, such funding has been relatively modest, but in recent years the Department of Defense (DOD) has grown more vocal in its desire to accelerate development and deployment of these systems. Arguments calling for increased funding for hypersonic weapons are gaining traction with lawmakers, based on illusory assumptions about adversaries’ capabilities and despite the absence of a compelling technical or strategic rationale for their need. Before rushing to pour additional money into these platforms, the Pentagon must make the case that hypersonics do more than simply materially match our international counterparts, but in fact further the strategic interests of the United States. Thus far, the case hasn’t been made.
Shawn Rostker
Shawn Rostker
Author
Shawn Rostker is a research analyst at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, where his work focuses on nuclear strategy, arms control and emerging technologies. He holds a Master's in Security Studies from Georgetown University and has been published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, The Diplomat, CalMatters, and Asia Times.