Hope for Civil Public Discourse Restored in San Diego County After Commission's Failed Attempt to Remove Pastor

Hope for Civil Public Discourse Restored in San Diego County After Commission's Failed Attempt to Remove Pastor
San Diego, Calif., on July 7, 2016. (John Fredricks/The Epoch Times)
6/12/2022
Updated:
6/14/2022
0:00
Commentary

For months, I've watched closely as the San Diego County Human Relations Commission (HRC) has struggled to manage conflict between its members regarding differing religious beliefs.

Watching these events unfold has been disheartening—especially since the sole purpose of the HRC is to “promote positive human relations, respect, and the integrity of every individual,” regardless of any protected class they may fall under, including religion. However, where there's conflict, there's opportunity to grow.

It's time to reflect on what we've learned from the HRC’s conflict and focus on what we can do moving forward to ensure people of all backgrounds and beliefs can thrive in our society.

Before we begin, let me briefly update you on the HRC’s actions.

Two months ago, I was saddened to see some members of the HRC condemn the verses of the Bible as “hate speech” when spoken by my appointee, Pastor Dennis Hodges, at a commission meeting and, further, vote to amend their bylaws to allow for the removal of any commissioner for making comments that his or her colleagues deem objectionable. In my previous op-ed on March 30, I discussed how the HRC’s inability to tolerate differing beliefs among themselves wasn't only antithetical to our country’s values of freedom of speech and religion, but it was also in direct opposition to the commission’s purpose.

At the board of supervisors meeting on April 5, 2021, the board, the HRC, and the public shared a fruitful conversation on how to best move forward and voted to approve the bylaws under one important condition: The bylaws wouldn't be retroactively applied to past grievances, in the spirit of helping the commission move past this conflict.

Despite our agreement, several HRC commissioners chose to not move forward with a clean slate and a spirit of collaboration. Upon those commissioners’ request, the HRC called a special meeting on June 9 to vote on the removal of Hodges from the commission. The motion to remove Hodges failed, and he'll maintain his seat on the HRC.

I'm hopeful after the June 9 vote because it proves there's still room for civility, respect, and tolerance in San Diego County’s public discourse. Here's how we can best move forward and ensure another situation like this doesn't occur again.

First, we must learn how to not only tolerate, but respect those who disagree with us.

There will always be people who we disagree with and may even dislike. What defines us is how we handle this conflict. Purging and isolating people with differing beliefs when their message doesn't fit our desired narrative isn't how we advance as a society. A competition of ideas produces the best results for society.

San Diego County is home to a beautifully diverse population, with a wide variety of cultures, races, religions, and ways of thinking. County employees, including county supervisors such as myself, don't get to pick and choose who they serve. Appointed commissions, such as the HRC, must keep in mind that respecting differing viewpoints isn't just a choice: It's their obligation as a public entity.

Next, the board of supervisors must remember its responsibility to mitigate financial risk to taxpayer dollars when appointed commissions provoke potential legal action.

If the HRC had voted to remove Hodges, a discrimination lawsuit might have been filed against the County of San Diego. And who pays for the County’s exorbitant litigation costs and settlements? All of us.

Is it fair that taxpayers would be bearing the burden for actions taken by unelected commissioners who couldn't be held accountable by the public? These are funds that we should be spending to fix our roads, build libraries, expand internet access, and improve our communities—not to tear each other down.

Thankfully, the county dodged such a lawsuit this past week. But moving forward, it's crucial that the board of supervisors maintain closer oversight over citizen commissions—and take action if the threat of a lawsuit arises.

When considering the HRC’s mission of promoting positive human relations, respect, and integrity in our communities, this commission has great potential to do good in our communities. I hope that, with these past few months behind them, the HRC can become a leading example in our county of how people overcome their differences to focus on what unites us, rather than divides us.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Author’s Selected Articles