Highlights and Lowlights on the Way to a $34 Trillion National Debt

The ethos that impelled generations of American leaders to refrain from laying a heavy debt burden on America’s children and grandchildren is long gone.
Highlights and Lowlights on the Way to a $34 Trillion National Debt
The National Debt Clock in Washington on Nov. 13, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)
Mark Hendrickson
2/29/2024
Updated:
3/6/2024
0:00
Commentary

Our country’s Founders abhorred government debt. In his Farewell Address, George Washington urged future congresses and presidents to avoid “the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertion in time of peace to discharge the debts, which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden, which we ourselves ought to bear.”

There you have a concise summation of the traditional American ethos about a national debt: (1) spend frugally, (2) go into debt only when needed to finance war and strive to repay those debts during times of peace, and (3) don’t send the bill for current expenses to future generations to pay—an egregious example of “taxation without representation,” the unjust practice that was one of the primary reasons why Americans fought the Revolutionary War.

Thomas Jefferson echoed Washington’s sentiment, writing that saddling future U.S. residents with debt was “swindling futurity on a large scale.”

Generally, generations of U.S. leaders, regardless of political party, have striven to contain the national (i.e., federal government’s) debt. A highlight was in the mid-1830s—the only time that the national debt was essentially zero, thanks to a president who hated government debt even more intensely than Washington and Jefferson: Andrew Jackson.

In 1900, the national debt still totaled less than $1 billion. Unfortunately, the foundations of fiscal soundness were already being eroded then because of the advances of the ideology of progressivism—the notion that the federal government’s role should be expanded beyond keeping U.S. residents safe to assisting them economically.

A crucial year early in our downward fiscal spiral was 1913, both for the passage of the 16th Amendment, which authorized a Marxian (graduated) federal income tax that set the stage for massive government redistribution of wealth in subsequent decades, and for the creation of the Federal Reserve System that led to the long-term erosion of our currency’s purchasing power.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal agenda was the next great step toward a growing national debt. First, FDR mistakenly established the quack cure of deficit spending as the proper government response to economic downturns. Then he corrupted U.S. politics permanently by perfecting the art of buying votes by strategically distributing New Deal money (details in Burt Folsom’s superb book, “New Deal or Raw Deal?”).

The next quantum step toward ultimate fiscal dissolution was President Lyndon B. Johnson’s infamous “guns and butter” policy, by which Uncle Sam waged a War on Poverty (another progressive expansion of the role of government) and a military war in Vietnam simultaneously. By the time that LBJ left office in 1969, the national debt had grown to more than $350 billion—more than 350 times what it had been in 1900. From there, the growth of the national debt has only gotten worse.

The national debt exceeded $1 trillion for the first time in 1982. Republican President Reagan made a deal with Democratic Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill: In exchange for funding a military buildup that would help to hasten the collapse of the Soviet Union a decade later, President Reagan agreed to large increases in progressive domestic spending priorities. One interesting way to look at the trillion-dollar milestone: It took 193 years—from 1789 to 1982—for Uncle Sam to accumulate a debt of $1 trillion. Just three decades later, the federal government had added more than $1 trillion in debt every fiscal year from 2009 through 2012 and at least that much in every year since fiscal year 2020, with projections of trillion-dollar-plus annual deficits every year for as far as we can see.

I remember writing a commentary on the national debt in 1992 when it reached $4 trillion—a debt accumulated over 203 years. Fast forward to fiscal years 2020 and 2021, and Uncle Sam had added almost $6 trillion in debt in just those two years. There was some hope in the late ’90s that we were pulling out of the national debt tailspin when the federal budget had a surplus for two years (four years, if you include Social Security surpluses in the calculations), but that was a fluke. There was a perfect storm or confluence of non-repeatable occurrences then: the end of the Cold War, leading to cuts in military spending, a significant welfare reform that cut the welfare roles approximately in half, the creation of Roth IRAs that induced many U.S. residents to take an upfront tax hit in exchange for their investments being allowed to grow tax-free thereafter, and the unique political dynamic of Democratic President Bill Clinton working with Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich. (An interesting sidelight: According to Treasury Direct figures posted by TheStreet.com, the national debt rose during every year of the Clinton presidency in spite of the annual figures apparently showing the budget to be in surplus. Make what you will of this discrepancy.)
When we entered a new century and new millennium, the federal budget process became fatally and irreversibly broken. Our second president from Texas, George W. Bush, emulated the first Texan, LBJ, with his own guns and butter program (War on Terror and establishment of Medicare Part D). On the Democratic side of the aisle, progressive caterpillars have morphed into socialist butterflies—spend, spend, spend, virtually without limit. And on the Republican side, when both Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump had Republican control of Congress, deficits and the national debt went up, not down. The GOP and Democrats may be playing good cop, bad cop with voters, but it is clear that neither party will bring spending, and therefore the national debt, under control.
Certainly, President Trump isn’t the answer to our fiscal woes. When he was in the White House, he cut a deal with Rep. Nancy Pelosi, then House speaker, to increase spending above previously agreed to limits and to suspend the debt ceiling until after the 2020 election. President Trump also demagogues the Social Security issue rather than acknowledging the mathematical imperative that the program be reformed to sustain solvency.
Bottom line: The national debt is at $34.4 trillion and counting. (Go to USDebtClock.org if you want to see up-to-the-minute figures.) The ethos that impelled generations of U.S. leaders to refrain from laying a heavy debt burden on U.S. children and grandchildren is long gone. There is no political will to alter our suicidal fiscal course.
The problem is not partisan, but systemic. Americans are addicted to debt. Nobody can say when the terminal dose of the debt drug will prove fatal to a functioning money, but when the day of reckoning comes, there will be a gnashing of teeth. Maybe then we will be ready to relearn the moral principle cherished by our Founders and other early generations of Americans that it is viciously unjust and cruel to burden future generations with debt that they played no part in accumulating.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Mark Hendrickson is an economist who retired from the faculty of Grove City College in Pennsylvania, where he remains fellow for economic and social policy at the Institute for Faith and Freedom. He is the author of several books on topics as varied as American economic history, anonymous characters in the Bible, the wealth inequality issue, and climate change, among others.
Related Topics