Viewpoints
Opinion

Explaining the Texas Presidential Election Case: Where the Supreme Court Was Right and Wrong

Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Explaining the Texas Presidential Election Case: Where the Supreme Court Was Right and Wrong
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C. on May 27, 2014. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Rob Natelson
|Updated:
Commentary

On Dec. 7, Texas sued Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, claiming that the way those states conducted their presidential elections violated Texans’ constitutional rights.

Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Rob Natelson
Rob Natelson
Author
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor, is Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence at the Mountain States Policy Center and the Independence Institute. He authored “The Original Constitution” (4th ed., 2025) and is a contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s “Heritage Guide to the Constitution.”
Related Topics