Do US Business Elites Really Believe ‘Woke’ Ideology?

Do US Business Elites Really Believe ‘Woke’ Ideology?
ESG stands for environmental, social, and governance. (Deemerwha studio/Shutterstock)
Lee Smith

With investment firms such as BlackRock demanding that companies meet environmental, social, and governance (ESG) benchmarks if they want investors’ money, U.S. corporate elites seem to have adopted a left-wing worldview. Does it mean that Big Finance is on the verge of going red?

No. It’s just a fashionable ideological cover that Wall Street is using to disguise its efforts to crush Main Street and bleed the middle class into servitude.

And yes. Insofar as communism is just a utopian narrative that 20th- and 21st-century ruling classes have used to rationalize oligarchy, the corporate class’s anti-free market rhetoric is evidence of its efforts to impoverish the middle class. Thus, the specter of “woke capital” is haunting the United States, where money managers such as BlackRock CEO Larry Fink sit at the top of an aspirational dictatorship of the proletariat.

In the latest episode of “Over the Target Live,” historian and essayist Michael Rectenwald explained how woke capitalism “is a monopoly scheme” designed to destroy free-market competition, the pillar of our economic and political system.

Fink and others are monopolists who talk like socialists. And for good reason, according to Rectenwald: “Socialism is nothing if not a monopoly.”

Rectenwald is the author of several books—such as “Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom” and “Springtime for Snowflakes: ‘Social Justice’ and Its Postmodern Parentage”—documenting the assaults on free inquiry and expression that characterize the age of woke.

In his most recent book, “Beyond Woke,” he explained why he left a top academic post at New York University. After taking to Twitter to parody the ritualized declaration of pronouns, the one-time leftist professor found himself on the outs with unhinged colleagues who called him a Nazi. He saw them as authoritarian shock troops.

“I began to see signs of totalitarianism,” Rectenwald told “Over the Target Live.” “Talking about changing people’s speech, forcing them to use language and to deny their own senses, to basically repeat patent nonsense as if it’s truth. This is exactly what happened ... in the Soviet Union, when people were demanded to speak lies repeatedly. And they had to live by the lie, as it were, and I just wouldn’t have it, and it made me rethink entirely my whole political outlook, my whole worldview.”

Wokeness is a euphemism for post-modern totalitarianism. As Rectenwald wrote in “Beyond Woke,” it’s at odds not only with free speech but also with morality:

“If to be moral is to choose right acting, it follows that moral behavior is impossible without freedom. Freedom to choose, and to choose wrongly, is a prerequisite for morality. But wokeness compels choice by group pressure. It either cows one into submission prior to the act, or shames one after it.”

Since leaving the academy, Rectenwald has become a major voice of dissent, focusing his critical acumen on a broad range of timely issues, from trans ideology and the abuse of language to the Great Reset cult and its destructive urges. Regarding woke capital, he has argued that the ESG index is an instrument weaponized by corporate elites to eliminate competition.

ESG divides “the woke wheat from the unwoke chaff and to starve the latter out of capital entirely,” he said.

“You can see this from the very top all the way down,” Rectenwald said. “You can look at Larry Fink, and BlackRock, Inc., his numerous threats and statements and BlackRock’s own literature that say, we’re going to starve these companies who do not abide by this ESG index, we’re going to starve them out of business.”

The effects on the middle class are meant to be devastating.

“This is an attempt to further eradicate middle-class small business owners, because they won’t be able to abide by these ESG precepts, it’s too expensive,” he said. “And it’s going to happen in all sectors. But the most frightening one is the agricultural sector.”

Rectenwald pointed to the Netherlands, where the Dutch government is throwing farmers off their land for not meeting ESG metrics. Dramatic declines in output are likely to follow, which will lead to costlier food and perhaps even famines.

He said that in spite of the widespread farmers’ protests, there’s no indication that the Dutch government will back down. After driving the farmers out of business, it will “buy these farms and make larger farms under the control of people that actually are able to afford this ESG-indexed production.”

The result will be food shortages throughout Europe, dependent on imports from the world’s second-largest food producer. Already fighting energy shortages, the continent may be destined for hard times ahead.

I asked Rectenwald if watching Europe’s coming pain and suffering will change any minds among the U.S. political and corporate elite. He’s hopeful.

“In order to turn the tide against all this—and what I would call really the Great Reset overall—is there have to be defectors amongst the elite ... who will effectively say, ‘Look, this is insanity. This is going to destroy Western Civilization, and we can’t have it,’” he said.

“[Otherwise] we won’t get a tidal change that’s necessary, at least in the mainstream media, for stopping all this.”

Making the problem worse, according to Rectenwald, is that there’s a core of cultists at the heart of the Great Reset movement that appears to have its heart set on apocalypse.

“The End Times is their whole underlying ethos,” he said. “They’re millennialists.” The difference between those who long for Christ’s thousand-year reign of peace and the Great Reset cult is that the latter is motivated by resentment.

“They’re fueled by resentment. They quite revel in destruction. They’re not looking for the return of [the] Messiah, or ... a heavenly afterlife. They’re looking for destroying what they deem to be pernicious on the face of the earth today, and they are anti-human at [their] base.”

Rectenwald is finishing a new book about the movement, “The Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty: Unraveling the Global Agenda.”

“I go deep into the history of the World Economic Forum and its precursors, the ideological and organizational structures that preceded it and actually led to it. I go into great depth about their Malthusian population control beliefs ... the roots of the environmental movement that they have embraced. And also further into the climate change catastrophist ideology,” he said.

Another way to think about the global elite project to set man against nature, according to Rectenwald, is as “the Great Leap Backward.” It’s a recasting of the Great Leap Forward, Mao Zedong’s sinister economic and social experiment in collectivization that, according to some estimates, killed more than 50 million people.

Ideologically, the Great Reset and the Great Leap Forward are very similar, according to Rectenwald. They’re both totalitarian assaults on the human race.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Lee Smith is a veteran journalist whose work appears in Real Clear Investigations, the Federalist, and Tablet. He is the author of “The Permanent Coup” and “The Plot Against the President.”
Related Topics