Destroying the Rule of Law to Get Trump

Former U.S. President Donald Trump sits at the defense table while waiting for proceedings to begin in his civil business fraud trial in New York State Supreme Court, in New York City, on Dec. 7, 2023. (Eduardo Munoz Alvarez-Pool/Getty Images)

Commentary

Robert Bolt’s prize-winning play “A Man for All Seasons” takes place in 16th-century England during the reign of King Henry VIII. Chancellor Sir Thomas More, a devout Catholic and the country’s highest-ranking lawyer, opposes the king’s decision to break with the Roman Catholic Church, which had refused Henry’s request to annul his marriage to his first wife, Catherine (who hadn’t borne him a son and heir), so that Henry could marry his mistress, Anne Boleyn.

Early in the play, More discusses the dangerous palace intrigue with his wife, Alice, his daughter Margaret, and her Protestant suitor, William Roper, a passionate but impressionable young man. When More insists that one must first violate an English law before being arrested, Roper’s moral sensibilities are affronted.

“So! Now you’d give the Devil benefit of law?” he protests.

“Yes,” says More. “What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?”

The high-minded Roper insists that he would “cut down every law in England to do that!”

Related Stories

We Are Well Beyond Hypocrisy

12/21/2023

The End of Social Democracy

12/21/2023

More warns Roper: “Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast—man’s laws, not God’s—and if you cut them down—and you’re just the man to do it—do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?”

Fast forward 500 years. The Democratic Party (and some of the GOP’s old guard) have decided that Donald Trump is the devil, and in William Roper-esque fashion, they are willing to cut down every law in the United States to get to him.

It started in 2016 with the baseless accusations that President Trump had somehow “colluded” with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election. The FBI lied multiple times to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to get federal warrants to spy on President Trump and his advisers. The Justice Department started a multiyear investigation, based upon “evidence” that they already knew was falsified “opposition research” commissioned and paid for by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign apparatus. Despite more than $30 million in taxpayer dollars spent, the “investigation” produced exactly nothing.

But President Trump’s enemies haven’t let up.

President Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives twice and acquitted twice.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, tried to prosecute President Trump for “falsification of business records,” despite the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and zero evidence of anything that would make the alleged conduct a felony.

New York’s Democrat attorney general, Letitia James, filed an action for civil fraud against President Trump, alleging that he undervalued his extensive property in Palm Beach, Florida, when applying for business loans. Ms. James wants to confiscate all of President Trump’s New York properties and cancel his licenses to conduct business.

New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, the judge presiding over the case, is determined to help her do it. Justice Engoron ruled pre-trial that President Trump had committed fraud. During the trial, Justice Engoron has deliberately ignored defense testimony from multiple real estate experts supporting the valuation of the property in President Trump’s financial statements, as well as that of the lenders themselves, who testified that they used their own appraisers, were paid back promptly, and were not defrauded.

The latest travesty is the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court to strike President Trump’s name from the ballot in that state “for his role in the January 6, 2021” riots at the U.S. Capitol. This gravely inappropriate decision not only exceeds the court’s power according to legal experts on both the left and right, but also is an obvious effort to ignore mounting evidence that undermines the left’s narrative that the Jan. 6 protests were an “insurrection” that President Trump “instigated,” an accusation for which President Trump has not been criminally charged and of which he was acquitted by the U.S. Senate in the second impeachment proceeding.

A bare 4–3 majority of the Colorado Supreme Court has disqualified the candidacy of a man with nearly 70 percent support from his own party and increasing support from constituencies traditionally outside the realm of the GOP. This is disenfranchisement of Colorado voters and interference with a national election.

Whether one thinks that President Trump is the devil or that his enemies are, the best protection against unlawful conduct is integrity in the application of the laws themselves.

When the rule of law is compromised, diluted, or discarded—even in pursuit of some purportedly lofty aim (“Saving our democracy!” “Fighting misinformation!” “Dismantling systemic racism!” “Liberating Palestine!”)—wrongdoers profit while the public suffers.

We’ve seen this already in the cities and states that have eliminated cash bail, refused to enforce theft and immigration laws, or looked the other way when left-wing mobs steal, burn, and destroy. We’re watching it play out at our southern border and on college campuses. Crime and antisocial behavior increase, because those who engage in that behavior know they can inflict damage without any consequences—to them.

What is being done to President Trump is part of the same pattern.

In “A Man for All Seasons,” Cardinal Wolsey tells Thomas More that it is his duty to his country to compromise his principles. More counters, “When statesmen forsake their own private conscience for the sake of their public duties ... they lead their country by a short route to chaos.”

In other words, using bad means to achieve allegedly beneficial ends was no excuse for corruption 500 years ago.

Nor is it today. Thomas More’s words predict our future. If the gatekeepers of the United States’ legal system succeed in their efforts to “cut down all the laws” of this country to get to their “devil,” all of us will pay a terrible price.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.