‘Democratic Socialism’: Yet Another Remake

The latest installment in an increasingly tired saga.
‘Democratic Socialism’: Yet Another Remake
Custom image by FEE
|Updated:
0:00
Commentary

Act I—Back From the Future

I’m from Argentina, and when I hear New York’s new mayor speak about “democratic socialism” as a path to “social justice,” I feel like someone who has already watched the entire movie: the prequel, the sequel, the reboot, and even the director’s cut. Different actors, different scripts, different settings—but always the same finale.
In Argentina, that film ran for more than a century under constantly changing, always appealing titles—“Inclusion,” “Equality,” “Solidarity,” “Rights”—and always with the same results. Rising inflation, expanding welfare dependence, collapsing incentives to work, and entire families living off government aid for generations, because earning a wage was no better than, and often no different from, receiving a welfare check. A once-prosperous nation slowly drained itself of productivity, individual agency, and opportunity—all while the narrative insisted it was heading toward a “happy ending.”

Act II—‘Democratic Socialism’: A New Genre?

The problem with this latest installment in the franchise, “Democratic Socialism,” isn’t the title itself—it’s the structure behind it. Adding the word democratic doesn’t change the genre. It doesn’t make the movie any less socialist or any less destructive. Its logic depends on the assumption that the State can play the role of the “good guy.”
Julieta Clara
Julieta Clara
Author
Julieta Clara is an Argentine writer and English teacher who explores political culture, institutional decay, and the everyday consequences of distorted incentives. Her work blends narrative clarity with a Latin American perspective on individual liberty. She writes from Argentina.