Cory Morgan: Guilbeault’s Concern Isn’t Roads and Emissions; It’s About Restricting Individual Mobility

Cory Morgan: Guilbeault’s Concern Isn’t Roads and Emissions; It’s About Restricting Individual Mobility
Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Environment and Climate Change for Canada speaks during a press conference at the COP26 U.N. Climate Summit in Glasgow, Scotland, on Nov. 12, 2021. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)
Cory Morgan
2/16/2024
Updated:
2/16/2024
0:00
Commentary

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault is desperately trying to recharacterize his own words since he let his mask slip with candid comments about road infrastructure and electric vehicles.

There is no getting around it. Guilbeault was pretty clear when he told attendees at a fundraising luncheon: “Our government has made the decision to stop investing in new road infrastructure. There will be no more envelopes from the federal government to enlarge the road network,” and “We can very well achieve our goals of economic, social, and human development without more enlargement of the road network.”

How else are we to interpret what the minister said?

He wants to hinder the development of any new road infrastructure within Canada.

Municipalities and provinces have the responsibility for building and maintaining roads. However, they are dependent upon federal government transfers for a significant part of their budgets.

Is there already an informal policy to not fund new roadways in place within Ottawa?

According to Alberta Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen it sure sounds like it. Alberta has nine outstanding applications for funding from the federal government for roadway infrastructure projects. So far, the province hasn’t gotten a penny transferred its way on those applications. The federal government hasn’t formally rejected the applications—it has just left them in approval limbo. It’s difficult to get large capital projects underway when the funding model is uncertain.
At the same luncheon, Minister Guilbeault poured cold water on the notion that personal electric vehicles—which his government is mandating by 2035—offer an answer to emissions reduction.

Canada is bringing in record numbers of immigrants. It is expected that all forms of infrastructure will need to be expanded to accommodate millions of new Canadians in the next few years. That infrastructure should include roadways.

How can cities handle so many more people without having new roads built?

Welcome to the concept of 15-minute cities. Ideologues like Guilbeault may not use that term for it, but that’s what they envision in the utopian society they are trying to force into creation.

Guilbeault imagines a world where everybody lives in high-density communities and where travel isn’t required. Through regulation and legislation, neighbourhoods will be designed where people can theoretically access all they need by walking or on public transit. He sees personal automobiles as a luxury that citizens don’t deserve, whether they are emission-free or not.

Authoritarian ideologues have always disliked the personal automobile. Personal autos empower individuals and empowered individuals are a threat to collectivism. When a person can simply hop into a car and work wherever they please, visit whomever they like, or move to new areas on a whim, that person is difficult to control. If a person lives in a high-density community and doesn’t have ready means to travel at their disposal, they theoretically will remain in one spot and have a minimal environmental impact on the environment.

When people like Guilbault become critical of even emission-free travel in personal vehicles, it becomes clear their issue isn’t with emissions. It’s with individual mobility.

Planners in the UK poked a hornet’s nest when the city of Oxford proposed a system where automobile owners would be issued permits for a limited number of passes to drive through their neighbourhoods annually and would be fined if they passed through the wrong area without a pass or went through it too many times. The program would be enforced by cameras using license plate recognition software. The plan caused outrage and exposed just how intrusive environmental ideologues in government were willing to get into managing people’s rights to mobility.

Rather than being so bold as to issue permits for movement, governments are now simply delaying or refusing permits for expansion. Municipalities often fight outward development and label it with the pejorative term “urban sprawl” while reducing available parking in cities. The federal government now appears to be stepping up to the plate by cutting transfers for new road construction. They won’t mandate people moving into high-density neighbourhoods. They will just systematically stop the construction of lower-density expansion of towns and cities. They hope to cork the bottle and force upward construction. All it has managed so far has been a housing shortage as real estate prices continue to escalate.

Guilbeault and others who have wrapped themselves in what they feel is a righteous eco-crusade can’t be reasoned with. They will continue to jet-set around the world to stay in lavish resorts for environmental conferences while telling the rest of us we must stay within 15 minutes of our residences.

We should be ever vigilant of the direction our policy-makers are taking us, and act before it’s too late.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.