White House to Develop Rules for Press After Acosta Incident

Ivan Pentchoukov
11/16/2018
Updated:
11/16/2018

The Trump administration will develop a set of rules and processes for media coverage at the White House to ensure orderly conferences and decorum. White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders made the announcement after a federal judge temporarily ordered the White House to restore the hard pass for CNN journalist Jim Acosta on Nov. 16.

District Court Judge Timothy Kelly ruled that the White House violated Acosta’s fifth amendment right to due process and granted CNN’s request to restore the reporter’s hard pass while the court case is pending.

“Today, the court made clear that there is no absolute First Amendment right to access the White House. In response to the court, we will temporarily reinstate the reporter’s hard pass,” Sanders said in a statement.

“We will also further develop rules and processes to ensure fair and orderly press conferences in the future. There must be decorum at the White House.”

President Donald Trump told reporters that the new rules will limit the number of questions each reporter gets.

“Decorum. You can’t take three questions and four questions. You can’t stand up and not sit down,” Trump said.

“We want total freedom of the press. It’s more important to me than anybody would believe,” the president added. “But you have to act with respect when you’re at the White house, and when I see the way some of my people get treated at news conferences, it’s terrible. So we’re setting up a certain standard, which is what the court is requesting.”

The White House revoked Acosta’s hard pass on Nov. 7, after he refused to give up a microphone during a presidential press conference and mistreated a White House intern who attempted to retrieve the device.

CNN argued in a lawsuit (pdf) that the White House violated Acosta’s First Amendment right to free speech, Fifth Amendment right to due process, and a protection against arbitrary and capricious acts by the government codified in the Administrative Procedure Act.

Judge Kelly only ruled on CNN’s arguments relating to the Fifth Amendment.

“Let’s go back to work,” Acosta said to reporters after the hearing.

Cable News Network (CNN) Chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta smiles as he departs after a judge temporarily restored Acosta's White House press credentials following a hearing at a District Court in Washington, on Nov. 16, 2018. (Carlos Barria/Reuters)
Cable News Network (CNN) Chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta smiles as he departs after a judge temporarily restored Acosta's White House press credentials following a hearing at a District Court in Washington, on Nov. 16, 2018. (Carlos Barria/Reuters)

In court, government lawyers said there is no First Amendment right of access to the White House and that Acosta was penalized for acting rudely at the conference and not for his criticisms of the president.

When called upon to ask questions, Acosta has frequently used the opportunity to advocate for contentious issues and disrupt press conferences. This approach has led to several clashes between him and White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders.

The judge said Sanders’s initial statement that Acosta was penalized for touching a White House staffer attempting to remove his microphone was “likely untrue and at least partly based on evidence that was of questionable accuracy.”

The Justice Department argued that the president has broad discretion to regulate which journalists or members of the public have access to the White House, similar to the discretion Trump exercises in choosing which journalists to grant interviews to and which journalists are acknowledged at press briefings.

“No journalist has a First Amendment right to enter the White House and the President need not survive First Amendment scrutiny whenever he exercises his discretion to deny an individual journalist one of the many hundreds of passes granting on-demand access to the White House complex,” the Justice Department stated in a court filing (pdf).

While some media outlets describe Acosta’s hard pass as his “press credentials,” the hard pass is one of several ways the press can access White House press conferences. A reporter may apply for daily and weekly passes. Compared to the temporary credentials, a hard pass grants reporters access to certain areas of the White House not otherwise accessible.

In explaining why Acosta’s pass was revoked, Sanders said he had “his hands on a young woman just trying to do her job as a White House intern.”

“This conduct is absolutely unacceptable. It is also completely disrespectful to the reporter’s colleagues not to allow them an opportunity to ask a question,” Sanders said at the time.

The White House Correspondents Association, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP), The New York Times, Fox News, and other organizations supported CNN in the lawsuit. The court brief by RCFP (pdf) specifically alleged that the actions of the White House were retaliatory and meant to intimidate the press.

One America News Network, a national cable news network, filed in brief opposing CNN and siding with the White House.

“Plaintiff Acosta’s history of interruptions, unnecessary and excessive consumption of time with his grandstanding, and obstructive conduct toward his colleagues should have been addressed by CNN and the WHCA some time ago,” W. Bruce DelValle, a lawyer representing OANN wrote in a brief (pdf) for the court.

“The actions taken by the White House are reasonable and justified to maintain an environment for press to function unhindered and reflect steps which should have been taken long ago by CNN.”

Reuters contributed to this report.
Ivan is the national editor of The Epoch Times. He has reported for The Epoch Times on a variety of topics since 2011.
twitter
Related Topics