LOUDOUN COUNTY, Va.—Loudoun County Commonwealth’s Attorney (CA) Buta Biberaj has announced that her office will no longer automatically be involved in prosecuting certain misdemeanor crimes, including trespassing, petty larceny, underage possession of alcohol, and being drunk in public.
“I would like to have the opportunity to present to you changes that are occurring in the Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney that may impact your courts,” Biberaj began in the letter. The change was based on the decision to prioritize resources for prosecuting “the more egregious cases that are being charged by law enforcement and threaten the safety of our community.”
Friday morning, Loudoun County Sheriff Michael Chapman released a statement stating that his office hadn’t received any official correspondence from Biberaj’s office. “While we are disappointed in this action by the Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney, we are doing everything in our power to support our deputies through this transition and will make every effort to ensure that we continue to partner with the community to provide the same great service to the everyone in Loudoun County.”
At the press conference on Friday afternoon, Biberaj said the letter to the judges was “prematurely released.”
“You didn’t know because it wasn’t your time to know,” she responded to a reporter’s question that law enforcement and others were surprised by the change.
“We invited our general court judges to have a conversation: how can we do this and best serve you and best serve our community?” she said of the process. “And from that conversation, the next step would be to talk to our law enforcement partners. The next step is to talk out to our defense bar in our community and then to be able to share that with the public.”
Biberaj said that her office promised transparency and had been “under a microscope.” “Since we’ve had Attorney General Miyares coming to office, there’s been a direct attack on our office about the things that we do,” she said.
In response to Biberaj’s comment and her new policy to stop handling certain misdemeanors, Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares told The Epoch Times, “Prosecutors cannot cherry-pick laws to enforce and laws to ignore—that’s not how our government works, and it establishes a dangerous precedent.”
Will Loudoun See Crime ‘Open Season?’
At the press conference, Biberaj said that misdemeanor crimes will still be prosecuted after Jan. 16.“If anyone reads the letter, there’s a portion in it as such talking about the fact that these cases are prosecuted, and they’re presented to the court by law enforcement.”
She said no one should read her letter and interpret it as, “This is an open season; go commit a crime.”
She added, “We would still prosecute those if we’re needed. So that’s the point I’m trying to make: all those cases will continue to be prosecuted. What we’re doing is we are extending the opportunity to our law enforcement officers to take the lead and making those presentations, but the prosecution has not changed. They will all be prosecuted.”
Chris Kachouroff, a criminal defense lawyer and a former police officer, said that “the words of the letter plainly indicate that the Loudoun Commonwealth’s Attorney will not prosecute these crimes. That’s open season.” He said that the CA’s office policy change would effectively lead to those misdemeanor cases not being prosecuted. According to his experience, law enforcement officers wouldn’t make the arrests if certain charges weren’t prosecuted.
Kachouroff also gave an example: Virginia’s petty larceny is any theft up to $1,000. “If you don’t think the bad guys know what this means, you are mistaken. They do,” he added. “And if these people aren’t even going to be arrested by the sheriff, they’re going to walk into all the retail stores, take clothes off the rack, and walk out. There’s nothing that anybody can do about it. Take a look at what is devastating the stores in California who has implemented the same policy.”
He also commented, “police officers are not lawyers, and they aren’t allowed to represent the state.” He said that sometimes the Virginia courts “play fast and loose with the rules in traffic cases, but these cases are not run-of-the-mill traffic cases. Sheriff’s deputies are not trained lawyers and cannot legally play the role of a prosecutor.”
“I think people here are not ready for that,” he told The Epoch Times. “And I think she [Biberaj] is getting a little bit of backlash.”
According to him, the law requires an artificial person, like a corporation or company, to be represented by a lawyer in court. He said a local government is also treated as an artificial person, and a lawyer is required. If not, a local government is getting an unwritten legal exception, and that’s not right, said Kachouroff.
Kachouroff added that the police officer’s role in court is more like a witness answering questions posed by the prosecutor, whose goal is to present the facts, so the judge will find the defendant guilty.
Biberaj Challenged in Re-Election
Earlier in the week, Elizabeth Lancaster—a Democrat, criminal defense lawyer, and former deputy public defender—announced to run against Biberaj in the primary for the next CA in Loudoun County. The next general re-election for the county’s leading criminal justice officer position is in November 2023.“Anyone who works in the justice system knows that the types of misdemeanor crimes Ms. Biberaj is refusing to be involved with are most often committed by our most vulnerable populations; folks with substance abuse disorders or those experiencing a mental health crisis,” Lancaster told The Epoch Times.
“Charges like trespass and drunk in public are often brought against our homeless population. These populations are already struggling to advocate for themselves for their basic needs, and yet we are going to ask them to do this in Court?” she added. “It is a dereliction of duty generally. It is an abomination for an elected official who ran on a platform of criminal justice reform.”
CA Personally Prosecuted Recent Trespassing Case
While a lack of resources was the reason for the CA’s office to drop the automatic involvement in some misdemeanor cases, on Jan. 3 and 4, Biberaj personally prosecuted a Loudoun father’s trespassing appeal case.
Biberaj’s office didn’t respond to The Epoch Times’ inquiry about why she personally prosecuted a trespassing case while shifting her office’s resources away from trespassing and other misdemeanor cases.
Tigges’ attorney Chris Kachouroff previously told The Epoch Times that Biberaj’s involvement in Tigges’ case was “highly unusual.”
“I’ve been practicing for 22 years. There are two times I can remember a Commonwealth’s Attorney personally prosecuting any case, and both were high-profile murder trials,” Kachouroff told The Epoch Times. “I cannot conceive of a Commonwealth’s attorney ever prosecuting a misdemeanor. They have the power, but that’s like the President screwing in the light bulbs in the White House. Can she do it? Sure, but why?”
The office said in a previous statement to The Epoch Times that it relies on law enforcement to make charging decisions. “When charges are filed and referred to the Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney, we assess the evidence and present it to the court. We may be disappointed at the decision, but we respect the decision and thank the court for its time and consideration of this matter.”
In August 2021, “Virginians for Safe Communities” (VSC) launched a signature campaign to recall Biberaj. The organization said the CA’s “neglect of duty, misuse of office, and incompetence in the performance of her duties” were reasons for its petition.
VSC told The Epoch Times, “We are rapidly approaching the required threshold of signatures. But as the 2023 election fast approaches, our efforts will begin to transition toward voter education ahead of the June 2023 primary election to ensure Ms. Biberaj is removed from office one way or another.”
- Traffic Offenses;
- Traffic infractions (the consequences are fines)
- Reckless driving: speeding under 90 mph
- First offense driving on suspended/no operator’s license
- Hit and run: property damage
- Eluding
- Registration and titling offenses
- Criminal Offenses, includes those offenses that are statutorily eligible for deferred findings:
- Trespass (deferred finding eligible)
- Petty Larceny
- Possession of Schedule III/IV (deferred finding eligible)
- Drunk in Public (max fine is $250)
- Underage Possession of Alcohol (deferred finding eligible)
- Noise Complaints
- Violations of Ordinances
- Failure to Appears
- Trials in Absence (not punishable by jail/fine only)
