Facebook Vows to Remove ‘Misinformation’ and ‘False Claims’ Ahead of Election

Facebook Vows to Remove ‘Misinformation’ and ‘False Claims’ Ahead of Election
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies virtually before the House of Representatives Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law in Washington on July 29, 2020. (Mandel Ngan/Pool via Reuters)
Zachary Stieber
9/3/2020
Updated:
9/3/2020

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said his company is going to crack down on “misinformation” because of concerns about people getting confused in the months leading up to the Nov. 3 presidential election.

“This election is not going to be business as usual,” Zuckerberg said in a Sept. 3 post on his platform. “We all have a responsibility to protect our democracy. That means helping people register and vote, clearing up confusion about how this election will work, and taking steps to reduce the chances of violence and unrest.”

Instead of waiting until 72 hours before the election, Facebook and state authority partners will, effective immediately, determine which claims about polling conditions are false and Facebook will remove the claims. Company officials are also banning all political advertisements the week before the election.

Facebook will also limit forwarding on its Messenger service to try to “reduce the risk of misinformation and harmful content going viral,” mimicking what it’s done on WhatsApp during “sensitive periods” of time.

The company is also going to try to quickly take down claims that could lead to voter suppression, such as “implicit misrepresentations about voting.” The example given was someone saying, “I hear anybody with a driver’s license gets a ballot this year.”

If one candidate says they win on the night of election, Zuckerberg said during an interview with “CBS This Morning,” Facebook would “add context and a label to that post saying there isn’t an official result on this election.”

Users would also be directed to Facebook’s Voting Information Center, which the company says would include official results provided through a partnership with Reuters, a wire agency that tilts left on political issues, and the National Election Pool.

“I generally believe that the best antidote to bad speech is more speech,” but with so little time before the election, the typical view is being thrown out the window, Facebook’s CEO said.

The logo for social media giant Facebook at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York's Times Square in 2018. (Richard Drew/AP Photo)
The logo for social media giant Facebook at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York's Times Square in 2018. (Richard Drew/AP Photo)

Zuckerberg cited the unprecedented predicted mail-in voting volume as driving the harsher oversight.

“One of the things that I’m quite worried about after election day is that, since it may make additional time for the votes to get counted this year, especially with the mail-in voting, there’s a greater chance of civil unrest and violence after the election,” he said during his virtual television appearance.

“Some people think that we’re going to get an answer to who won the election on election night. I don’t think we’re necessarily going to get that. And I think it’s important that we start preparing people now. There’s nothing illegitimate about taking a few extra days—or even weeks—in order to make sure that all the votes get counted.”

In a statement sent to The Epoch Times, Samantha Zager, the Trump campaign’s national press secretary, said, “In the last seven days of the most important election in our history, President Trump will be banned from defending himself on the largest platform in America.”

“When millions of voters will be making their decisions, the President will be silenced by the Silicon Valley Mafia, who will at the same time allow corporate media to run their biased ads to swing voters in key states,” she added.

The Biden campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment.

While some experts say mail-in voting fraud is rare and the election should run smoothly, others have noted that the volume of mail-in voting for this election will be unlike anything seen in the history of the United States. The U.S. Postal Service already struggled to handle ballots sent in during primaries across multiple states, leading to a weekslong delay in declaring the winners of multiple primary races.

Attorney General William Barr said in an interview released this week that the Department of Justice is conducting big voter fraud investigations. He also said mass mail-in voting is an invitation for voter fraud and coercion.

“We haven’t had the kind of widespread use of mail-in ballots as being proposed,” Barr said. “We’ve had absentee ballots from people who request them from a specific address. Now what we’re talking about is mailing them to everyone on the voter list, when everyone knows those voter lists are inaccurate.”