Chinese Military Build-Up Aimed at Ousting US Forces From West Pacific: Think Tank

By Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng is based in Sydney. He focuses on national affairs including federal politics, COVID-19 response, and Australia-China relations. Got a tip? Contact him at
August 11, 2021 Updated: August 11, 2021

The People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) expansion in the western Pacific is aimed at ousting the United States armed forces from the region in the long term so that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can easily assert control and influence over neighboring regions, according to an Australian think tank.

The Lowy Institute, a Sydney-based think tank, has released a paper examining the build-up of PLA maritime and aerospace capabilities. It also found that Australia could no longer rely on sheer distance from Asia as a defense, and Australian authorities needed to prepare contingencies in case of conflict.

“China appears to be building a force specifically intended to be able to eject the U.S. military from the western Pacific by force, to stare it down in a crisis, or to encourage the United States to step away from its current commitments due to overstretching, defeatism, or frustration with allies,” wrote author Thomas Shugart, an adjunct senior fellow at the Defense Program at the Center for a New American Security.

A Taiwanese Air Force F-16 in foreground flies on the flank of a Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) H-6 bomber as it passes near Taiwan on Feb. 10, 2020. (Republic of China (ROC) Ministry of National Defense via AP)

“While the degree of any such development could vary widely, even a partial withdrawal of U.S. power from the western Pacific would accelerate the ongoing deterioration in the regional military balance, with profound consequences on the freedom of action of regional nations like Australia.”

Shugart noted that in a worst-case scenario if the United States were to vacate the region, it could encourage nations such as Japan and South Korea to adopt a neutral role. This would allow Beijing to focus its efforts further afield.

The report outlined that Beijing’s build-up included mass production of naval warships, ballistic missiles, and advancements in bomber aircraft in recent times. New airbases in the South China Sea also extended the reach of current PLA bombers.

The PLA has also been expanding its fleet of DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile launchers. The U.S. government estimated in 2018 that the PLA had 16 to 30 launchers. By 2020, that number had increased to more than 200.

Beijing’s bomber aircraft, the H-6, has also seen rapid upgrades and new models. From 2009, the PLA Air Force produced the H-6K, H-6J, and the H-6N, the latter of which has the range to strike anywhere in Australia, even if dispatched from mainland China.

Beijing’s overall shipbuilding efforts have outstripped the United States in recent years, with Beijing building 38 million tonnes of shipping (about 42 million U.S. tons), compared to 70,000 tonnes from the U.S in 2020.

In terms of new naval hardware, the United States and the PLA remain on par.

“Were China building a military truly focused on largely defensive objectives, one would expect to see an emphasis on smaller escort ships, coastal defense missiles, fighter aircraft, and the like,” Shugart wrote.

Epoch Times Photo
A type 094 Jin-class nuclear submarine Long March 15 of the Chinese Navy participates in a naval parade in the sea near Qingdao, in eastern China’s Shandong Province on April 23, 2019. (Mark Schiefelbein/AFP via Getty Images)

“Instead, China has engaged in the largest and most rapid expansion of maritime and aerospace power in generations. Based on its scope, scale, and specific capabilities, this build-up appears designed foremost to threaten the United States with ejection from the western Pacific, and thereafter to achieve domination in the Indo-Pacific.

“To be sure, the PLA’s missile forces are not invincible or unstoppable.”

Shugart noted that U.S. armed forces were likely developing countermeasures to disrupt Beijing’s communication and reconnaissance satellites and, in turn, interrupting any potential offensive.

“One can also imagine robust efforts to disrupt, whether via kinetic means or otherwise, the links and nodes in China’s command and control networks that would be necessary to transmit targeting information from its sensor networks to its missile units,” he said.

In July, 120 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) siloes were discovered in the northwestern city of Yumen, China, indicating an expansion in the CCP’s nuclear arsenal.

Meanwhile, U.S. and democratic forces haven’t backed down and have continued carrying out military exercises in the region.

Joseph Siracusa, adjunct professor of international diplomacy at Curtin University, said the key for Australia was maintaining the Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty (ANZUS).

“Whatever government is in power, for more than 70 years, the primary goal of Australian foreign policy has been to keep the United States engaged in the region, as the ultimate guarantor of Australian security,” he told The Epoch Times.

“For Washington, during this same period of time, Australia remains the ‘southern anchor’ of America’s Asia-Pacific security arrangements (with Japan the ‘northern anchor’), astride both the Indian and Pacific oceans, intermediate between California and Southeast Asia.”

Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng is based in Sydney. He focuses on national affairs including federal politics, COVID-19 response, and Australia-China relations. Got a tip? Contact him at